Working Papers

Alternative Teacher Compensation – A Primer

Julia E. Koppich, Jessica Rigby. Policy Analysis for California Education. March 2009

A new PACE Working Paper has been released in conjunction with our Learning About New Forms of Teacher Compensation Conference on March 30 and 31, 2009. Written by Julie Koppich and Jessica Rigby, this policy primer is designed to provide baseline information about new forms of teacher pay that are emerging around the country, to support the local conversations and negotiations that will lead to the development of innovative compensation systems.

Smart Schools, Smart Growth – Investing in Education Facilities and Stronger Communities

Policy Analysis for California Education. December 2008

California is midway through one of the grandest public infrastructure projects ever attempted. Over the coming decade school officials will complete an $82 billion effort, building new schools and renovating old facilities, supported by taxpayers and private investors. But are state officials and local planners building schools mindfully to advance educational quality and lift local communities?

Parallel Play – Preschool and K-12 Finance Reform in New Jersey and Texas

Bruce Fuller, Joseph Wright. Policy Analysis for California Education. July 2007

In a PACE Working Paper, Co-Director Bruce Fuller and Joseph Wright offer policy and implementation lessons from two states – New Jersey and Texas – that have moved to advance preschool and K-12 finance reform in tandem. These states have assembled the puzzle pieces in differing ways, but both states are determined to widen access for families who can least afford quality preschool. The policy experiences of these states over the past quarter century yield notable lessons for current policy debate on pre-school and education finance reform in California.

The Unequal Opportunity to Learn in California's Schools: Crafting Standards to Track Quality

Andrea Venezia, Julie Maxwell-Jolly. Policy Analysis for California Education. February 2007

This paper, stemming from a PACE seminar, examines the idea of crafting opportunity to learn (OTL) standards—how the state might collect and analyze indicators of school quality that are predictive of student achievement. The idea is not new. Such standards were put forward by Congress over a decade ago. However, questions remain regarding which quality indicators can be feasibly monitored and which are empirically related to achievement gains. Developing, implementing, and monitoring such a system would be challenging.

Community Voices: California Preschool Directors Speak on Policy Options

Bruce Fuller, Kathryn Gesicki, Thea Sweo, Sunyoung Jung. Policy Analysis for California Education. January 2007

PACE’s statewide survey of 439 directors of community preschools, those funded outside of school districts, inquired about basic facts and their perceptions of long-term issues. Preschool access and quality remain unfairly distributed among California’s diverse communities. Persisting questions examined include how to grow more plentiful and higher quality preschools, and how to ensure a robust balance between organizations run by schools or community organizations.

Snapshots of Reform: District Efforts to Raise Achievement across Diverse Communities in California

Elisabeth L. Woody, Soung Bae, Sandra Park, Jennifer Russell. Policy Analysis for California Education. October 2006

In California, policymakers and educators had already turned their attention to addressing inequities in student achievement with the passage of the Public School Accountability Act (PSAA) in 1999. PSAA provided a framework for learning with curriculum standards, and set expectations for improvement through the Academic Performance Index (API). For the first time, schools were responsible for meeting achievement targets not just school-wide, but for racial/ethnic and socioeconomic subgroups of students.

Is the No Child Left Behind Act Working? The Reliability of How States Track Achievement

Bruce Fuller, Kathryn Gesicki, Erin Kang, Joseph Wright. Policy Analysis for California Education. January 2006

Debate is well under way regarding the effi cacy of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, including whether this bundle of federal rules and resources is prompting gains in student achievement. Spirited conversation will intensify as the Congress discusses how to adjust and reauthorize this ambitious set of school reforms. Both state and federal gauges of student achievement will inform this debate.


PACE thanks these funders and sponsors for their financial support