Year-round school calendars, widely adopted in California due to school crowding, aim to evenly distribute school days. Multi-track calendars, seen as cost-saving, accommodate larger student bodies. There is a belief that redistributing summer breaks could counteract summer learning loss, particularly for disadvantaged students. Research highlights caution regarding year-round schooling. While cost savings are clear, academic gains haven't materialized, impacting high-risk student groups negatively. California showed notably negative effects compared to neutral outcomes in Wake County, North Carolina, where multi-track calendars were used widely. This disparity emphasizes considering demographics; schools with substantial minority or low-income populations may face different challenges. The findings caution policymakers against risking student achievement solely for minor savings. Tailored approaches for schools based on their demographics are suggested. The academic benefits of year-round schooling remain scarce, except for addressing severe overcrowding. Yet, amid tightening budgets, year-round schools are cautiously endorsed as a financial reform, urging further examination and context-specific considerations in policymaking.

The Student Success Act of 2012 in California prompts a restructure of student support services in higher education. A new study evaluating a guidance program at South Texas College offers insights for California policymakers and nationwide. This program aimed to aid students struggling in entry-level math courses, a common hurdle in community colleges. It involved Beacon Volunteers giving brief presentations in math classes about available campus services. The evaluation, using random assignment, showed a 30% increase in tutoring center visits and a 20% drop in math class withdrawals. While overall pass rates didn't significantly rise, part-time students benefited with a 10% increase in pass rates. The study highlights the effectiveness of brief, in-classroom interventions and suggests lessons for researchers and practitioners, emphasizing the feasibility of whole-class randomization, the need for more tutoring center research, and the scalability and affordability of such interventions. It underscores the impact of providing information directly to students before they require assistance, offering valuable insights for educational practices.

Professional development serves as a crucial support system for teachers to implement rigorous standards and improve student learning. In California, with rising demand, designing more effective teacher training becomes essential. Research highlights the role of teacher interactions in professional development's success, termed "spillover effects." These occur when teachers share and apply their learning, impacting both teaching and student achievement. A current study on spillover effects from the National Writing Project revealed significant impacts. Teachers deeply engaged in longer, diverse, and interactive professional development were more likely to aid others in teaching writing. Their expertise extended to colleagues, sometimes matching direct professional development effects. Recommendations include fostering teacher interactions within and after professional development, aiding individual growth, and promoting wider knowledge dissemination among teachers. Encouraging collaborative learning among teachers through professional development can support whole-school reforms, fostering innovation and coherent instructional practices. Principals play a vital role, motivating teachers to participate and nurturing both "go-to" teachers and "experts" capable of mentoring peers. This strategy cultivates internal capacity, fostering teacher leadership and collaboration, crucial for effective educational reform.

In California, income-based reading gaps persist. Summer reading programs, including home-based ones, combat the "summer slide." A meta-analysis of 35 studies shows they enhance reading, especially comprehension. School-based programs with research-based strategies notably impact comprehension scores. Low-income students benefit more, perhaps due to differing summer learning loss patterns. Control group students from higher-income backgrounds gain reading scores over summer, contrasting with stable or declining scores for low-income peers, magnifying program effects. However, benefits diminish over time for all. The analysis supports summer programs for literacy. While both school-based and home-based approaches seem equally effective overall, school-based methods stand out with research-based strategies. Despite initial advantages, low-income students also experience fading effects. Addressing this fade-out and ensuring year-round support become crucial for sustaining summer gains.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) ensures a free and appropriate education for students with disabilities in the US, necessitating services tailored to their needs. However, these specialized services come at a higher cost. To manage these expenses, some states like California use the census funding model, allotting aid based mainly on total district enrollment and a fixed amount per student, independent of specific program characteristics. A new policy brief delves into the pros and cons of this method and discusses ways to address its drawbacks. Advantages include simplicity, legal compliance, adaptability, potential cost-effective placements, and preventing over-identification of disabilities. Yet, there are concerns about inequitable funding, potential inadequacy over time, disincentivizing quality services, and jeopardizing legal protections if students aren't identified. The authors suggest considering adjustments based on regional factors, poverty, disability rates, and monitoring changes to achieve fairness. They also advocate for exploring cost-effective program delivery and weighing alternatives for special education funding structures to better support students while managing costs.

Researchers investigate how policy environments influence teacher participation in professional development, focusing on high-stakes (mathematics) and low-stakes (science) subjects. Analyzing a national sample of high school math and science educators, it uses hierarchical linear models to understand these associations. The findings indicate that policy contexts significantly impact teachers' engagement in impactful professional development, particularly in high-stakes subjects. Aligning state standards with assessments emerges as a key policy element driving teachers' involvement in content-focused professional development, especially in mathematics. The research highlights that policy proximity to teachers strengthens these correlations. State and school policies play a crucial role in teachers accessing quality professional development, especially in high-stakes subjects. Policies emphasizing alignment between standards and assessments stand out as influential factors in encouraging teachers to partake in effective professional development.

A new study delves into enhancing college completion rates through state financial aid reforms. It synthesizes evidence, emphasizing four key strategies: providing clear aid application information, simplifying eligibility criteria, offering early commitments, and aligning aid with state policy objectives. Presently, states have numerous complex aid programs that lack clarity and are poorly publicized. Most aid is not committed until late in high school, creating financial planning difficulties. Moreover, a significant portion of aid is merit-based rather than need-based. Authors recommend consolidating aid programs for clearer eligibility, prioritizing early awareness, and aligning aid with state goals. These reforms aim to maximize educational attainment without increasing financial investment. Achieving these changes involves reshaping aid structure and delivery mechanisms, demanding strong commitment from state officials, campus leaders, and education advocates. While not a solitary solution, these reforms can significantly expand educational access and opportunities.

Researchers spotlight the importance of evaluating the progress of English Learners (ELs), those Reclassified as Fluent English Proficient (RFEPs), and their combined group. An inherent issue emerges: successful RFEPs are often excluded from EL progress assessments due to their reclassification. Analyzing 2010 California data reveals critical insights: RFEPs constitute a significant portion of initially classified ELs (IELs), demonstrating the underestimation of the IEL population when focusing solely on current ELs. Additionally, RFEPs' achievements closely align with English-only students (EOs), suggesting an exaggerated achievement gap between EOs and IELs when RFEPs are omitted. Furthermore, neglecting RFEPs hinders recognizing positive trends; their increasing numbers and enhanced English Language Arts proficiency between 2005 and 2010 remain unnoticed. Policy suggestions emphasize the consistent inclusion of RFEPs in progress assessments to ensure accurate evaluations, especially within federal mandates like the Common Core Initiative.

The "what gets tested, gets taught" adage needs updating to "what gets tested and included in school accountability, gets taught." During No Child Left Behind, science took a backseat to reading and math due to its optional status in accountability measures. Examining states' pre- and post-NCLB performance on NAEP for grades four and eight showed that integrating science into accountability positively impacted fourth-grade scores without affecting math or reading. Eighth-grade results showed no similar link, likely due to dedicated science teachers. Fourth-grade classrooms often burden a single teacher with multiple subjects, leading to a focus on tested areas like reading and math. Research involving fourth-grade teachers in states incorporating science scores confirmed increased science teaching time. California's testing of science from fifth grade misses the earlier integration potential highlighted in this research. While the Elementary and Secondary Education Act reinstated science testing, it still leaves the accountability weight to states. Considering the global need for STEM education, consistently aligning science with reading and math in assessments appears practical. Acknowledging the persistent focus on school accountability, integrating science into assessments is a sensible step to address the current fragmented attention on science education.

In California, student mobility disrupts education for both students and educators, especially in urban schools serving disadvantaged communities. A recent study delves into the Success for All (SFA) program's effectiveness, focusing on early literacy skills for grades K–5. Research utilized a large-scale trial's unique setup to assess SFA's impact on later elementary grades (3–5) by comparing schools implementing SFA in different grade clusters. Surprisingly, the study found no positive or negative effects of SFA in grades 3–5 compared to standard instruction. This contradicts the program's previously observed positive effects in earlier grades from the same trial. These findings suggest that strategies successful in early grades might not seamlessly translate to later ones. However, it is important to note that this study's setup does not mirror the intended SFA implementation. Still, it echoes the experiences of many mobile students who begin in later grades at new schools. The paper concludes that more research is necessary to understand how schools can better support mobile students, emphasizing the need for improved instructional designs in later elementary years, despite earlier successes.

Researchers explore the impact of class diversity on cross-racial interaction in higher education, particularly pertinent in states post-affirmative action bans like California. While class diversity indirectly influenced interactions, racial diversity had a direct effect. Interacting across class lines correlated with greater racial interaction, but class diversity alone did not ensure robust engagement with racial diversity. A new study finds that despite a relationship between race and class diversity, they are not interchangeable. Racial diversity's impact was not overshadowed by class diversity, indicating its distinct influence on cross-racial interaction. Class diversity, coupled with racial diversity, was noted to challenge racial barriers and enhance conditions for interracial contact, aligning with Gordon Allport's contact theory. In California's higher education, threats to diversity arise from limited state funding and increased out-of-state enrollments. Despite enrolling many Pell Grant recipients, racial diversity remains limited, highlighted in legal cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas. The study underscores the crucial role of both class and racial diversity in preparing students for engagement in a diverse society and contributing to civic good.

Policymakers aim to boost four-year college attendance for disadvantaged students who often end up in less advantageous two-year colleges. Navigating complex college procedures without parental guidance poses challenges. Traditional counseling falls short due to time constraints and individualized approaches. Chicago Public Schools introduced a coaching model focusing solely on postsecondary plans, engaging students proactively, fostering relationships, and utilizing group sessions. Studying students post-high school revealed gaps in the enrollment process, especially among Latino and low-SES students. Encouraging completion of college-related tasks bridged these gaps, increasing specific plans and enrollment chances. Schools with coaches saw higher rates of students attending four-year colleges, particularly benefiting low-SES and Latino students. However, questions linger about neglecting high achievers, early intervention's impact, and long-term college persistence effects. New research underscores that group advising, like the coach program, may enhance educational outcomes for disadvantaged students, promising potential improvements in the future.

Career and technical education (CTE) battles outdated perceptions as a fallback for struggling students. Despite national academic reforms, CTE has evolved, emphasizing college and career readiness through blended academic and technical skills. Federal initiatives like the Perkins Acts transformed CTE into a broader curriculum, aiming to equip students with various skills through career clusters and integrated courses. Analyzing over 7,000 students' transcripts, a recent study found that those taking occupational CTE courses alongside academics showed similar math learning gains to those solely in academic courses. This challenges expectations of CTE's academic impact, particularly amidst initiatives like the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), which emphasize academics and integration. The study questions CTE's effectiveness in improving math learning and suggests the need for refined courses that better reinforce academic skills. It prompts a reevaluation of federal investments in CTE, highlighting the necessity for alignment with evolving academic standards to benefit students' overall educational outcomes.

California, a pioneer in school-based accountability, established the Academic Performance Index (API) in 1999, encompassing subjects and graduation rates. With the move past No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the state aims to enhance the API by embracing student growth, college readiness, and broader academic and social objectives. A RAND study identified additional measures adopted by 20 states, expanding beyond NCLB requirements, including student performance in extra subjects, growth over time, performance indices, and college readiness indicators. Emerging measures cover safe school environments, graduation risk, and interim assessments. RAND suggests customized local indicators, aligned incentives, supportive teaching structures, local validation studies, and collaborative statewide systems to foster comprehensive data collection and decision-making. As the Common Core assessments approach, the paradigm shifts towards redefining student achievement measurement, urging a holistic approach to data collection to inform stakeholders effectively.

In response to the No Child Left Behind Act, discourse around "failing schools" disproportionately affects minoritized communities, sidelining broader educational visions and eroding arts from public school learning. California's arts programs suffer, with 89% of K–12 schools lacking consistent arts education. This scarcity predominantly affects minoritized youth, amplifying disparities in resource-deprived schools, denying these students the qualitative problem-solving and social growth inherent in arts engagement. Advocating for arts and diversity education reform, a new study urges reconsideration of teachers' attitudes toward arts and challenges limited perspectives on students' experiences. Researchers emphasize the transformative potential of arts as a tool for minoritized school reform, fostering agency and cultural representation for impacted communities. The study dismantles the term "minority," advocating for a reimagining of multicultural education as universally designed to cater to all communities' needs. Researchers further propose leveraging arts as research tools to comprehend classroom dynamics and family roles within school communities, redefining research purposes and literacy values in K–12 education. The study ultimately calls for open engagement and dialogues involving minoritized and majoritized youth to underscore the potential impact of arts in research, curriculum, and pedagogy, challenging binary thinking and inviting exploration toward equitable, hopeful futures for all.

In recent years, budget cuts led to increased class sizes across the US. California notably saw a 20% rise, adding over 4 students per class between 2009–2010. This sparks debate on allocating limited resources, with class size at its core due to its impact on educational costs. Studies on class size effects show inconsistent, modest benefits. Although reducing class size incurred substantial costs in the past, raising it could mitigate harm amid budget cuts. California's prior investment in smaller classes yielded limited effects due to swift implementation. Rising class sizes’ impact depends on implementation; layoffs based on teacher effectiveness might counteract negative effects on student achievement. The debate centers on balancing budgets without compromising student learning, especially crucial amid fiscal challenges in education.