Recent policy changes in California’s education system have opened up a unique opportunity to improve educational opportunities for the state’s 1.4 million English learner students (ELs). The implementation of new state standards including new English Language Development standards will require...

October 22, 2015 | The Californian

California's 1.4 million English Learner children are often pigeon-holed and trapped for years in a school system that also impedes their academic progress and blocks their path to college. That’s the conclusion of a report released this week and published...

July 29, 2014 | EdSource

After nearly two decades, bilingual education in California could stage a resurgence if the state Senate approves a bill in August that would put the issue on the ballot in November 2016.

April 1, 2012 | HTH Unboxed

Almost all the politics of education concerns rearranging adult power and privilege. Relatively little political energy is spent consciously designing a contemporary system of public education. That should change.

By focusing political energy on how students learn rather than the...

Time to Move Education Politics from Regulation to Capacity Building
Commentary author
Summary

The contemporary education system lacks Learning 2.0 due to misplaced priorities, fixating on regulations and mandates rather than holistic system design and capacity enhancement. To enable Learning 2.0, three crucial actions are imperative. First, embrace 21st Century tools for continuous learning design, fostering experimentation in institutions such as charters and pilot schools. Second, facilitate deregulation, allowing flexible financing and progress evaluation based on subject mastery rather than seat time. Lastly, invest in a learning infrastructure focused on students as end-users, promoting open-source courseware and a network of learning utilities. This transformative approach aims to establish a peer-to-peer collaborative system, emphasizing the importance of the commons where teachers contribute and adapt. The ongoing political battles around technology regulations overlook the essential question of who constructs Learning 2.0. Teachers should serve as educational artisans, actively involved in crafting learning experiences rather than solely managing external learning technology. To support this, the state should fund computer access, incentivize teacher participation, and establish design standards, aligning with Learning 2.0's vision for an adaptable, collaborative educational landscape.

Time to Move Education Politics from Regulation to Capacity Building
Commentary author
Summary

The exploration of innovative educational models in diverse schools like High Tech High, New Tech at Jefferson High School, and the Avalon School reflects a shift toward Learning 2.0. Emphasizing project-based learning, personalized education plans, and a redefined role for educators, this new paradigm seeks to break away from conventional teaching methods. It advocates for individualized learning experiences, leveraging technology to empower students and adapt education to their needs. By unbundling learning components, encouraging self-monitoring, and redefining basic skills to encompass collaborative problem-solving, Learning 2.0 aims to create a more flexible, engaging, and relevant educational system, preparing students for the complexities of the modern world while challenging traditional educational norms.

Time to Move Education Politics from Regulation to Capacity Building
Commentary author
Summary

The landscape of education, currently entangled in debates over power dynamics, neglects conscious redesign of a contemporary public education system. Shifting political focus from contentious issues to understanding how students learn could birth a truly modern system. Dubbed Learning 1.0, the current structure, born in the early 20th century, relies on standardized grading, subject-specific lessons, and year-end tests, outdated in today's dynamic world. This acquisition-based model overlooks the growing trend of "just in time" learning, where knowledge is sought when needed, emphasizing integration of learning and practice. The gap between acquiring knowledge and its practical application has widened, rendering the traditional system inadequate. While cultural and political factors impede progress, the potential for Learning 2.0—a personalized, flexible, experiential model—is propelled by technological advancements and evolving perceptions of learning. Transitioning to this new paradigm necessitates not just changes in schools but also reshaping societal views on education methodologies, offering an opportunity for profound reform to meet the needs of the 21st-century learner.

Commentary authors
Summary

For nearly three decades, PACE has facilitated discussions on California's education policies by integrating academic research into key policy challenges. Traditionally, this involved publishing policy briefs, organizing seminars, and producing the annual 'Conditions of Education in California' report, offering comprehensive data and analysis on the state's education system. The launch of "Conditions of Education in California" as a blog marks a shift to engage a wider audience and enable ongoing updates. This platform, authored by PACE-affiliated researchers across California, aims to share new data, compelling research findings, and insights on current legislation and policies. The objective remains fostering informed discussions on education policy challenges in California, now extending the conversation to policymakers, educators, and citizens. This inclusive dialogue is crucial to drive the necessary policy understanding and momentum for improving the state's education system.

Commentary author
Summary

"Getting Down to Facts" is a new research initiative commissioned by Governor Schwarzenegger's Committee on Education Excellence, state Democratic leaders, and Superintendent Jack O'Connell. Led by Susanna Loeb, a Stanford Graduate School of Education Professor and PACE codirector, this project seeks to explore California's school finance and governance systems. Its objective is to provide comprehensive insights essential for assessing the effectiveness of potential reforms. The initiative addresses three key questions: the current state of school finance and governance, optimizing existing resources for improved student outcomes, and evaluating the need for additional resources to meet educational goals. The studies from this project are expected to be available by January 2007.