Time to Move Education Politics from Regulation to Capacity Building
Commentary author
Summary

The contemporary education system lacks Learning 2.0 due to misplaced priorities, fixating on regulations and mandates rather than holistic system design and capacity enhancement. To enable Learning 2.0, three crucial actions are imperative. First, embrace 21st Century tools for continuous learning design, fostering experimentation in institutions such as charters and pilot schools. Second, facilitate deregulation, allowing flexible financing and progress evaluation based on subject mastery rather than seat time. Lastly, invest in a learning infrastructure focused on students as end-users, promoting open-source courseware and a network of learning utilities. This transformative approach aims to establish a peer-to-peer collaborative system, emphasizing the importance of the commons where teachers contribute and adapt. The ongoing political battles around technology regulations overlook the essential question of who constructs Learning 2.0. Teachers should serve as educational artisans, actively involved in crafting learning experiences rather than solely managing external learning technology. To support this, the state should fund computer access, incentivize teacher participation, and establish design standards, aligning with Learning 2.0's vision for an adaptable, collaborative educational landscape.

Time to Move Education Politics from Regulation to Capacity Building
Commentary author
Summary

The exploration of innovative educational models in diverse schools like High Tech High, New Tech at Jefferson High School, and the Avalon School reflects a shift toward Learning 2.0. Emphasizing project-based learning, personalized education plans, and a redefined role for educators, this new paradigm seeks to break away from conventional teaching methods. It advocates for individualized learning experiences, leveraging technology to empower students and adapt education to their needs. By unbundling learning components, encouraging self-monitoring, and redefining basic skills to encompass collaborative problem-solving, Learning 2.0 aims to create a more flexible, engaging, and relevant educational system, preparing students for the complexities of the modern world while challenging traditional educational norms.

Time to Move Education Politics from Regulation to Capacity Building
Commentary author
Summary

The landscape of education, currently entangled in debates over power dynamics, neglects conscious redesign of a contemporary public education system. Shifting political focus from contentious issues to understanding how students learn could birth a truly modern system. Dubbed Learning 1.0, the current structure, born in the early 20th century, relies on standardized grading, subject-specific lessons, and year-end tests, outdated in today's dynamic world. This acquisition-based model overlooks the growing trend of "just in time" learning, where knowledge is sought when needed, emphasizing integration of learning and practice. The gap between acquiring knowledge and its practical application has widened, rendering the traditional system inadequate. While cultural and political factors impede progress, the potential for Learning 2.0—a personalized, flexible, experiential model—is propelled by technological advancements and evolving perceptions of learning. Transitioning to this new paradigm necessitates not just changes in schools but also reshaping societal views on education methodologies, offering an opportunity for profound reform to meet the needs of the 21st-century learner.

A Step in the Right Direction
Commentary author
William Perez
Summary

Approximately 25% of California K–12 students are English Language Learners. Despite our best efforts, less than 60% of ELLs are English proficient after 6 years. In addition, their achievement levels are well below their English proficient counterparts. One of California Governor Jerry Brown’s gubernatorial goals is to reduce the messy number of categorical funding formulas and thus increase funding for English Language Learners and low income families.He would also like the State Board of Education to adopt instructional materials that provide intensive intervention and support for English Learners and to use existing federal funds to expand after-school and summer school programs to supplement English Learning programs.

Commentary authors
Summary

For nearly three decades, PACE has facilitated discussions on California's education policies by integrating academic research into key policy challenges. Traditionally, this involved publishing policy briefs, organizing seminars, and producing the annual 'Conditions of Education in California' report, offering comprehensive data and analysis on the state's education system. The launch of "Conditions of Education in California" as a blog marks a shift to engage a wider audience and enable ongoing updates. This platform, authored by PACE-affiliated researchers across California, aims to share new data, compelling research findings, and insights on current legislation and policies. The objective remains fostering informed discussions on education policy challenges in California, now extending the conversation to policymakers, educators, and citizens. This inclusive dialogue is crucial to drive the necessary policy understanding and momentum for improving the state's education system.

April 22, 2009 | Stanford News

Graduation rates for low-achieving minority students and girls have fallen nearly 20 percentage points since California implemented a law requiring high school students to pass exit exams in order to graduate, according to a new Stanford study. The new study...

September 19, 2008 | LB School Bulletin

A recent report by UC Berkeley-based Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) praises the Long Beach Unified School District for its effective, systematic efforts to boost student performance. “The Long Beach Unified School District is nationally recognized for its systematic...

February 2, 2007 | In These Times

Although some argue that it’s too early to pass judgment, recent evidence suggests that the bill has fallen short of its lofty goals, leaving parents, educators and legislators discontented. Three major studies released in November reported persistent achievement gaps between...

Commentary author
Summary

"Getting Down to Facts" is a new research initiative commissioned by Governor Schwarzenegger's Committee on Education Excellence, state Democratic leaders, and Superintendent Jack O'Connell. Led by Susanna Loeb, a Stanford Graduate School of Education Professor and PACE codirector, this project seeks to explore California's school finance and governance systems. Its objective is to provide comprehensive insights essential for assessing the effectiveness of potential reforms. The initiative addresses three key questions: the current state of school finance and governance, optimizing existing resources for improved student outcomes, and evaluating the need for additional resources to meet educational goals. The studies from this project are expected to be available by January 2007.

December 1, 2005 | SRI International

This annual report provides an update on California’s teacher development and teacher quality policies; discusses trends in the supply of and demand for teachers; examines data on novice, underprepared, out of field teachers; and investigates the local policies and decisions...

November 28, 2004 | The Los Angeles Times

As teachers and principals throughout California and the country struggle to satisfy the increasing demands of the federal No Child Left Behind law, education experts and school officials say they are paying increasing attention to the middle-of-the-road students who have...

September 21, 2004 | Education Week

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, signed into law by President Bush on Jan. 8, 2002, was a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the central federal law in pre-collegiate education. The ESEA, first enacted in...

January 2, 2004 | The Berkeley Daily Planet

President Bush likes to say diversity is America’s greatest strength. But when it comes to schools seeking a passing grade under the landmark education law he championed, a diverse student body can be a school district’s greatest liability, according to...

October 18, 2000 | The Los Angeles Times

A state lawmaker said Tuesday that she will ask for an investigation into a statistical anomaly that allows school scores on the Academic Performance Index to go down even if all the groups of students within the school improved their...

September 8, 1999 | SFGATE

One in four children across the nation has left the neighborhood school in favor of a magnet or charter school, voucher program or private school, despite lax oversight and scant evidence of academic success, according to a two-year study released...