Performance-based accountability (PBA) encourages using achievement data for school improvement, including student assignment decisions. A recent study focuses on Florida elementary schools under PBA to understand their practices. While all schools used performance data (test scores, course grades) for student assignments, there was little variation between high- and low-performing schools. Despite PBA's intent to assist struggling students, researchers found no significant shift in assigning them to more effective teachers. Schools aimed for balanced classrooms, distributing high, middle, and low performers equally across teachers. Principals emphasized fairness and conducive learning environments over targeting struggling students to specific teachers. This study reveals that while PBA influenced using performance data for assignments, it did not prompt schools to allocate struggling students to the most effective teachers. Principals prioritized fairness, maintaining balanced classrooms, and spreading students evenly across teachers rather than concentrating struggling students with particular educators.

The enactment of Senate Bill 2042 in California led to the development of the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) to evaluate teacher candidates. However, PACT's generic approach might not effectively assess English-Language Arts (ELA) candidates, especially in rural border schools where cultural context plays a pivotal role. Researchers examine how PACT assesses ELA candidates in such contexts. Two central inquiries drive the study: the influence of school accountability and available resources on teaching during PACT. Reviewing eight ELA teacher candidates' PACT Teaching Event commentaries revealed constraints like standardized tests and limited resources, hampering candidates' ability to develop culturally relevant teaching methods suited for rural settings. The study suggests enhancing PACT by evaluating candidates' abilities to connect teaching with rural themes, address educational inequalities, foster critical thinking, and promote collaborative learning. It recommends assessing teachers' adaptability within complex sociocultural contexts. Further research is proposed to explore effective learning strategies for bilingual, bicultural students in rural border areas and design culturally sensitive assessments and curricula that accommodate diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds.

Policymakers are reshaping teacher evaluation by emphasizing student test scores, classroom observations, and elevating the stakes tied to evaluations. Race to the Top mandates states to gauge and reward teachers based on student performance measures like "value-added," which constitutes about half of evaluations in states such as Florida and Ohio. The remaining 50 percent comprises teacher assessments typically conducted by school administrators, influencing decisions on tenure, dismissal, promotion, and compensation. The Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project explores diverse teacher evaluation methods. However, the relationship between teachers' value-added scores and principals' evaluations remains understudied. A recent study examined 294 teachers in a Florida school district. Comparing principals' ratings and matched value-added scores, researchers found weak correlation between them. Some highly-rated teachers had low value-added scores due to perceived lack of effort or solitary work. Conversely, some low-rated teachers had high value-added scores, attributed to contributions beyond their classrooms and personal challenges. This study highlights that evaluation tools influence not only immediate teacher rewards but also long-term teaching qualities. High stakes on principal evaluations may shift teachers toward visible effort and social interactions, while emphasis on value-added scores might refocus them on classroom activities. Ultimately, the choice of evaluation tools shapes the nature and focus of the teaching profession.

Researchers explored the impact of a Washington state incentive program aimed at increasing the number of National Board Certified Teachers (NBCTs) working in high-poverty schools. The state doubled bonuses for NBCTs in such schools. The study tracked changes in NBCT numbers and their distribution across schools, comparing three groups: NBCTs, all state teachers, and a demographic similar group without NBCT certification. During the study period, the number of NBCTs working as K-12 classroom teachers in Washington significantly increased. There was also a notable rise in the proportion of NBCTs in high-poverty schools. The analysis indicated that NBCTs had similar retention rates but showed more movement between schools compared to non-certified teachers. Additionally, NBCTs in challenging schools tended to stay in the same school at higher rates, suggesting the certification program helped retain experienced teachers in these settings. This study highlights the potential of increased compensation to motivate teachers, especially in challenging schools. However, it suggests the incentive might not have prompted many teachers from non-challenging to challenging schools. It also proposes improvements, such as encouraging groups of NBCTs to move collectively to challenging schools and granting districts more flexibility in determining which schools need NBCTs the most.

Over the last 15 years, federal and California laws have aided older foster care adolescents in completing high school and accessing higher education. Education is crucial for these youths, often lacking family support. Attainment significantly influences stable employment and self-sufficiency. Despite investments, few studies focus on educational impact for foster care teens. Research in three Midwest states showed small differences in employment and earnings between those with no credential and a GED. High school diploma completion offered a substantial advantage, while some college yielded further benefits, and the highest outcomes were seen in college graduates. On average, former foster care youths earned half of their general population counterparts and faced a 22-point employment gap. However, similar education levels narrowed these gaps, with education impacting foster care youths more than their peers. GED completion didn't significantly alter outcomes, emphasizing the importance of high school diplomas. Legislation emphasizing high school completion and college entry aligns with findings. Yet, to ensure sustained support during degree completion, laws might require reevaluation or expanded partnerships. The California Fostering Connections Act extension to 21 might boost college participation, but higher earnings suggest the need for ongoing support through degree completion.

Over decades, rural areas consistently lose younger residents, especially in economically challenged regions offering unstable work. This outmigration leads to imbalanced demographics, with better-educated individuals leaving and those remaining having lower education and incomes. This shift creates uncertainty about education's significance linked to leaving. Retaining youth becomes vital for rural areas. Recent studies suggest schools inadvertently encourage departure by prioritizing high achievers, yet research involving 9,000 rural students counters this. While high-achieving rural students tend to leave, they share strong community ties and similar desires to depart as their peers. Schools aren't actively pushing students away; instead, students' views on local economies shape their aspirations, irrespective of academic status. This emphasizes rural youths' connections and potential retention if opportunities arise. It underscores the need for national/regional policies supporting rural sustainability, addressing the wider lack of opportunities in rural America. It might not merely be local underinvestment but rather a systemic absence of regional/national investment in rural areas.

National concern persists regarding teacher education improvement, yet consensus on effective strategies remains elusive. Emphasis lies on enhancing preservice training and professional development, requiring evidence-based approaches. However, influential studies, like the National Council on Teacher Quality's critique, lack solid evidence, relying on document analysis instead of direct assessment. Impactful teacher education research should exhibit systematic classroom effects, blending quantitative and qualitative methods on a significant scale for broader applicability. However, an analysis of 196 articles from leading teacher education journals in 2012 reveals a limited focus on the impact of teacher education or professional development on teachers and students. While these studies often showed positive outcomes, their scale and depth were insufficient to influence policy. To facilitate informed policymaking, collaboration between education bodies and policymakers is vital to identify crucial research questions. Ensuring adequate funding for comprehensive, large-scale studies is essential, given current limitations. Encouraging diverse expertise within research teams, spanning methodology and diverse backgrounds, can enrich insights and contribute to comprehensive policy formulation.

The debate over education accountability centers on the pressure imposed by high-stakes measures, criticized for favoring high-performing schools and flawed indicators of success under No Child Left Behind. Many states and districts adopt value-added modeling, attributing student achievement changes to schools, aiming for a fairer evaluation considering various factors. A study comparing California's accountability measures (AYP and API) with value-added models in 29 elementary schools supports critiques: AYP and API strongly correlate with student backgrounds, disadvantaging low-SES schools. Conversely, the value-added approach exhibits weaker ties to background, highlighting exceptional performance in some low-SES schools without penalizing those with advanced students. It challenges the notion that sub-800 API schools are universally underperforming. This study urges a reevaluation of accountability measures, considering the benefits of value-added models that don't strongly link performance to student backgrounds. While more research is needed, these findings advocate for discussions about integrating value-added elements into current assessments to foster fairer evaluations in education.

A new survey examines California elementary school officials' awareness of AB-2109, a law tightening personal belief exemptions for school immunizations. Findings revealed limited understanding among respondents, with low awareness and knowledge of the law's details. Only health workers showed better comprehension. Despite this, schools planned to communicate the requirements to parents. Yet, officials highlighted the need for more staff education, district guidance, and support materials. The survey emphasizes the necessity of further information dissemination about AB-2109 to all school staff involved in implementing immunization policies, from enrollment to parent interaction, to ensure effective compliance.

The stringent focus on standardized tests in California has narrowed teaching to align with state assessments, potentially reducing exposure to subjects like the arts, especially for disadvantaged students. To test the impact of arts exposure, a large-scale experiment took students to an art museum. Results showed a significant improvement in critical thinking skills, notably among minority and economically challenged students, with a 9% increase in the critical thinking measure after the museum visit. Despite the modest intervention—a brief museum visit guided by professionals—students reaped notable benefits. This suggests that cultural institution visits could offer meaningful learning experiences. Policymakers and educators should consider targeting such opportunities, especially for disadvantaged students. The study highlights the risk of curtailing such experiences due to budget constraints and test pressures, underscoring the potential loss of valuable outcomes like critical thinking skills. Therefore, preserving or enhancing these experiences is crucial for students' holistic development, particularly for those facing economic challenges.

Researchers examined how each state addressed specific learning disabilities (SLDs) among culturally diverse students under the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Analyzing state policies, they found 36 states lacking beyond federal guidelines, while fewer than half had specific regulations. Guidance documents varied widely, detailing practices from CLD-sensitive assessments to personnel suggestions. California included interpreter use and peer comparison for CLD students. Some states demonstrated integrated support, but California lacked this. The study urges comprehensive, integrated state-level guidance for CLD students, emphasizing coordinated communication among state departments to improve local education agency practices.

Over the past decade, surveillance systems and surveys have emerged to monitor student health behaviors, aiding public health approaches in preventing risk behaviors and promoting health. These systems are vital for understanding problems, tracking trends, and shaping interventions. Military-related events negatively impact academic and emotional outcomes for military-connected (MC) children. The Building Capacity in Military-Connected Schools initiative, a collaboration between USC and eight districts, aims to foster inclusive and supportive school environments for both military and nonmilitary students. The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS), a comprehensive surveillance system, mandated by the state’s Department of Education, collects data from students, parents, and school staff. The Building Capacity initiative expanded this by including modules specifically addressing military connections. Surveys revealed priorities like bullying, mental health, and threat assessment. Districts used this data to organize workshops, implement new programs, and consider policies for supporting MC students, creating safer and more tailored school environments. These surveillance systems empower districts to develop targeted, evidence-based interventions and policies based on unique school needs and shared concerns.

On February 14, 2014, Assemblyman Alejo introduced AB 1750 to create model high school ethnic studies programs in California. Ethnic studies focuses on marginalized racial groups, counterbalancing Euro-American perspectives in the curriculum. New research reviews studies on ethnic studies' impact, indicating positive outcomes on academic engagement, achievement, and racial understanding. Programs tailored to specific racial groups often enhance academic success, particularly among students of color. Diverse curricula, addressing racism directly, benefit overall racial attitudes. In higher education, diversity experiences and cross-racial interaction positively affect students, especially White students. The evidence consistently supports the positive academic and social impact of well-designed ethnic studies programs. AB 1750 presents a promising path for California's diverse students.

Researchers investigated teacher hiring in Chicago Public Schools (CPS), exploring if disparities in teacher quality across schools arise from teachers' preferences or principals' hiring practices. Using data from CPS job fairs, they tracked where prospective teachers applied. Schools with fewer disadvantaged students received more applicants. Disadvantage, measured by free/reduced-price lunch eligibility, consistently predicted application rates compared to other school characteristics. Proximity to candidates' homes strongly influenced application choices; candidates favored schools closer to home. African American applicants leaned toward schools with more African American students, while Hispanic applicants preferred more limited English proficiency concentrations. Applicants with math/science degrees applied to schools with better-performing students. This sorting led to fewer applicants in certain schools. The study highlights stark differences in applicant numbers across schools, suggesting that districts may face challenges staffing geographically isolated or disadvantaged schools. Targeted efforts directing more applicants to these schools could alleviate staffing shortages and benefit underserved communities.

The KIPP network of charter schools aims to enhance academic outcomes for low-income students through rigorous standards and increased classroom time. Mathematica Policy Research conducted a study assessing KIPP's impact, accounting for the differences between students who chose KIPP and those who didn't. Analyzing 41 KIPP middle schools over a decade, they found that students in these schools demonstrated substantial growth in reading and math, equating to 90% of an extra year of math and two-thirds of a year in reading compared to their non-KIPP peers. These positive effects were consistent across most schools and extended to other subjects and low-stakes assessments. Even when employing random admissions lotteries, the impact remained significant. The reasons behind KIPP's success remain ambiguous—whether it's due to instructional strategies, drawing students from underperforming schools, or positive peer effects remains uncertain. Further research is needed to decipher these causes and determine if KIPP's methods could be broadly applicable to improve student achievement in public schools, potentially prompting the adoption of their successful practices in traditional public schools or expanding successful charter networks.

Researchers conducted a study examining the impact of individualized student coaching on college persistence rates. They partnered with InsideTrack, a coaching service, and conducted a randomized experiment involving non-traditional college students across different types of universities. InsideTrack coaches interacted regularly with students, focusing on goal setting, daily activities alignment, and skill development like time management and study skills. The coaching intervention led to a 10% increase in persistence during the treatment period and a significant 15% increase in students attending the university a year after coaching ended. This long-term impact is crucial as many interventions' effects usually fade post-treatment. Moreover, coaching was more cost-effective than other interventions like increased financial aid. While the specific mechanisms driving these effects remain unclear, the proactive and personal nature of the coaching, addressing personal struggles more than academic details, and being one of the few personal interactions for online students were noted. The study suggests that external coaching partnerships like InsideTrack could provide a scalable model to aid college persistence. This research illuminates effective strategies to address challenges hindering college student persistence.

In the U.S., a growing trend places over 50% of students with disabilities in general education classrooms, raising concerns about its impact. Research, focused on non-cognitive outcomes like social skills and behaviors, from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study reveals that classrooms with more disabled peers, especially those with emotional/behavioral disorders, correlate with increased problems and decreased social skills in kindergarten and first-grade students. However, factors like higher academic ability among non-disabled students, experienced teachers, fewer students reading below grade level, and increased teacher special education training can mitigate these effects. This study's significance lies in guiding California's educational policies amid efforts to integrate disabled students, emphasizing the importance of addressing non-academic outcomes crucial for overall success. Understanding these dynamics aids in creating supportive classroom environments for all affected students.

Researchers investigated the impact of the YMCA High School Youth Institute (YI) on low-income urban youth. The comprehensive, year-round program significantly improved the academic performance of participants compared to a matched comparison group. YI students demonstrated higher standardized test scores in English Language Arts and Math, improved attendance, and notably higher academic grades. The success of the YI program stemmed from its comprehensive structure, emphasizing positive youth development through supportive relationships, meaningful engagement, skill-building activities, and technology integration. Key strategies for such programs included diverse academic support such as daily homework assistance, college readiness programs, technology access, GPA-linked internships, and project-based learning aligned with state standards. These programs aimed to develop critical skills while nurturing creativity through hands-on, community-focused learning. Tailoring programs for low-income youth involved a focus on technology proficiency, critical thinking, problem-solving, and information accessibility. Incorporating these elements into out-of-school programs effectively attracts, retains, and positively influences the academic achievement of high schoolers from economically challenged backgrounds.

In the months leading up to high school graduation in California, seniors excitedly anticipate the transition to college or the workforce. However, unforeseen financial and procedural obstacles often jeopardize the college plans of diligent students, resulting in what's termed "summer melt." Research, drawing on national surveys and urban school district data, reveals that 10 to 40 percent of college-intending students fail to enroll after being accepted, especially impacting low-income students and perpetuating socioeconomic disparities. The complexities of post-acceptance tasks, primarily linked to college financing, pose significant barriers. Students face challenges securing additional funds to bridge financial aid gaps and navigating bureaucratic hurdles, lacking guidance during the crucial summer period. Fortunately, interventions during this time have shown promise. Low-cost initiatives, like counselor-led support and text messaging campaigns providing task reminders and links, yielded substantial enrollment increases of 5 to 15 percent. These summer interventions, notably cost-effective compared to other college supports, present a crucial opportunity to assist low-income students. By investing in targeted information and counseling during this window, substantial strides can be made in enhancing college access for these hardworking individuals.

American policymakers prioritize STEM education, yet many high school grads lack STEM readiness. Early science and math education is crucial for future success, suggesting a need for strong elementary STEM foundations. However, an analysis reveals a decline in weekly elementary science instruction, dropping from 3.0 to 2.3 hours between 1993–94 and 2007–08, with a shift towards math and language arts. California notably offered only 1.8 hours per week in 2007–08. More science class time correlated with higher grade 4 NAEP scores, indicating a 12-point difference between four and one-hour instruction. While time mattered, socioeconomic factors significantly impacted achievement disparities. This underscores the necessity of policy shifts at all education levels to ensure equitable science education. Addressing accountability’s influence on curricula and instruction across subjects is vital. Striking a balance and fostering equitable access to quality science education demands systemic policy changes for fair STEM learning opportunities for all students.

School reform emphasizes transferring decision-making power to individual schools, seen in districts like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and beyond California. Principals gain control over budgets, curricula, schedules, and professional development, aiming to enhance student learning. Yet, the impact of this decentralization on school performance remains largely unknown. In Chicago, a study of an autonomy program revealed increased reading proficiency among elementary students after two years, but no significant gains in math or overall achievement scores. Principals leaned toward autonomy in budgets and curricula. Policy suggestions arise: policymakers must allow time for schools to adapt to autonomy, understanding improvements might not be immediate. They should also avoid neglecting high- or low-achieving students in pursuit of proficiency rates, affecting school evaluations. Further research is crucial to understand how decentralized control affects academic performance, examining how school leaders leverage autonomy to assess its potential for improving schools.

Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) incur significantly higher educational costs due to mandated services, yet face higher suspension rates, lower academic proficiency, and higher dropout rates. However, the selection of accommodations, modifications, and interventions lacks clarity and evidence of effectiveness. A comprehensive literature review identified 68 potential accommodations for EBD/ADHD students, but only 18 studies covering 12 strategies were found, with limited evidence supporting their efficacy. Notably, the widely used strategy of extended time showed no significant benefit and may potentially harm students with ADHD. Recommendations call for policymakers to clarify federal mandates, define accommodations, and promote evidence-based selections. They advocate for increased funding and rigorous research to determine effective interventions and emphasize implementing competency-building interventions alongside accommodations. Adoption of models prioritizing student competency, like the Life Course Model, is encouraged for policymakers and educators to streamline effective accommodation selection. These steps aim to bridge the gap between policy, research, and effective implementation to better support students with EBD/ADHD.

Policymakers aim to enhance educator quality by imposing licensure requirements, yet a recent study in Educational Policy challenges the effectiveness of these barriers. Traditionally-certified teachers, despite extensive training, showed no significant advantage over alternatively-certified teachers in improving student achievement. Surprisingly, higher performance on licensure exams correlated with more effective teaching, and alternatively-certified teachers scored notably higher on these tests, attracting individuals with stronger academic capabilities. This suggests that current licensure screens might not accurately predict classroom success. Both traditional and alternative routes to teaching have pros and cons, but existing barriers exclude effective teachers and admit ineffective ones. Policymakers face two options: refining licensure screens for better prediction or reducing hurdles and allowing local school leaders to make hiring decisions. As no clear method exists to identify the best teachers beforehand, a move toward more flexibility in hiring might offer a pragmatic solution.

Proponents support school choice to enhance education, but research often overlooks its impact on school practices and achievement. A new study delves into whether charter school proximity influences school practices and its relation to math and reading achievement using Early Childhood Longitudinal Study data. Results show minimal impact on school practices based on charter proximity. Closer schools reported lower teacher absenteeism and better-aligned instruction, yet these changes did not remarkably affect reading or math achievement. Contrary to beliefs, charter growth does not appear to prompt organizational shifts in public schools due to entrenched cultural norms. Similarities between charter and public schools overshadow differences, hindering learning exchanges. Moreover, charters in disadvantaged areas may lack resources to impact public school competition. This study questions the efficacy of market-driven approaches in addressing educational challenges. Understanding the connection between competition, school practices, and student achievement is vital for directing policy initiatives effectively.

Teacher contract limitations on involuntary transfers hinder districts from optimizing teacher distribution. In California and similar areas, these constraints prevent involuntary teacher moves, impacting the allocation of effective teachers. Loosening these restrictions might help strategically place teachers for better outcomes. However, it could also risk transferring ineffective teachers to different disadvantaged schools, potentially harming students. A new study focused on Miami-Dade County Public Schools examined three years of involuntary teacher transfers—around 375 teachers were moved based on the district's best interest. These teachers tended to have higher absences and lower prior student performance. Despite this, the transfers notably improved equity in teacher distribution between disadvantaged and advantaged schools without evidence of moving ineffective teachers between low-performing schools. Transferred teachers reduced absences in new schools, but their impact on student test scores stayed low, often placed in untested grades or subjects. Nonetheless, the policy positively affected teacher productivity and equitable teacher distribution, especially benefiting underserved student populations when strategically implemented.