On February 14, 2014, Assemblyman Alejo introduced AB 1750 to create model high school ethnic studies programs in California. Ethnic studies focuses on marginalized racial groups, counterbalancing Euro-American perspectives in the curriculum. New research reviews studies on ethnic studies' impact, indicating positive outcomes on academic engagement, achievement, and racial understanding. Programs tailored to specific racial groups often enhance academic success, particularly among students of color. Diverse curricula, addressing racism directly, benefit overall racial attitudes. In higher education, diversity experiences and cross-racial interaction positively affect students, especially White students. The evidence consistently supports the positive academic and social impact of well-designed ethnic studies programs. AB 1750 presents a promising path for California's diverse students.

The KIPP network of charter schools aims to enhance academic outcomes for low-income students through rigorous standards and increased classroom time. Mathematica Policy Research conducted a study assessing KIPP's impact, accounting for the differences between students who chose KIPP and those who didn't. Analyzing 41 KIPP middle schools over a decade, they found that students in these schools demonstrated substantial growth in reading and math, equating to 90% of an extra year of math and two-thirds of a year in reading compared to their non-KIPP peers. These positive effects were consistent across most schools and extended to other subjects and low-stakes assessments. Even when employing random admissions lotteries, the impact remained significant. The reasons behind KIPP's success remain ambiguous—whether it's due to instructional strategies, drawing students from underperforming schools, or positive peer effects remains uncertain. Further research is needed to decipher these causes and determine if KIPP's methods could be broadly applicable to improve student achievement in public schools, potentially prompting the adoption of their successful practices in traditional public schools or expanding successful charter networks.

In the U.S., a growing trend places over 50% of students with disabilities in general education classrooms, raising concerns about its impact. Research, focused on non-cognitive outcomes like social skills and behaviors, from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study reveals that classrooms with more disabled peers, especially those with emotional/behavioral disorders, correlate with increased problems and decreased social skills in kindergarten and first-grade students. However, factors like higher academic ability among non-disabled students, experienced teachers, fewer students reading below grade level, and increased teacher special education training can mitigate these effects. This study's significance lies in guiding California's educational policies amid efforts to integrate disabled students, emphasizing the importance of addressing non-academic outcomes crucial for overall success. Understanding these dynamics aids in creating supportive classroom environments for all affected students.

Researchers investigated the impact of the YMCA High School Youth Institute (YI) on low-income urban youth. The comprehensive, year-round program significantly improved the academic performance of participants compared to a matched comparison group. YI students demonstrated higher standardized test scores in English Language Arts and Math, improved attendance, and notably higher academic grades. The success of the YI program stemmed from its comprehensive structure, emphasizing positive youth development through supportive relationships, meaningful engagement, skill-building activities, and technology integration. Key strategies for such programs included diverse academic support such as daily homework assistance, college readiness programs, technology access, GPA-linked internships, and project-based learning aligned with state standards. These programs aimed to develop critical skills while nurturing creativity through hands-on, community-focused learning. Tailoring programs for low-income youth involved a focus on technology proficiency, critical thinking, problem-solving, and information accessibility. Incorporating these elements into out-of-school programs effectively attracts, retains, and positively influences the academic achievement of high schoolers from economically challenged backgrounds.

In the months leading up to high school graduation in California, seniors excitedly anticipate the transition to college or the workforce. However, unforeseen financial and procedural obstacles often jeopardize the college plans of diligent students, resulting in what's termed "summer melt." Research, drawing on national surveys and urban school district data, reveals that 10 to 40 percent of college-intending students fail to enroll after being accepted, especially impacting low-income students and perpetuating socioeconomic disparities. The complexities of post-acceptance tasks, primarily linked to college financing, pose significant barriers. Students face challenges securing additional funds to bridge financial aid gaps and navigating bureaucratic hurdles, lacking guidance during the crucial summer period. Fortunately, interventions during this time have shown promise. Low-cost initiatives, like counselor-led support and text messaging campaigns providing task reminders and links, yielded substantial enrollment increases of 5 to 15 percent. These summer interventions, notably cost-effective compared to other college supports, present a crucial opportunity to assist low-income students. By investing in targeted information and counseling during this window, substantial strides can be made in enhancing college access for these hardworking individuals.

American policymakers prioritize STEM education, yet many high school grads lack STEM readiness. Early science and math education is crucial for future success, suggesting a need for strong elementary STEM foundations. However, an analysis reveals a decline in weekly elementary science instruction, dropping from 3.0 to 2.3 hours between 1993–94 and 2007–08, with a shift towards math and language arts. California notably offered only 1.8 hours per week in 2007–08. More science class time correlated with higher grade 4 NAEP scores, indicating a 12-point difference between four and one-hour instruction. While time mattered, socioeconomic factors significantly impacted achievement disparities. This underscores the necessity of policy shifts at all education levels to ensure equitable science education. Addressing accountability’s influence on curricula and instruction across subjects is vital. Striking a balance and fostering equitable access to quality science education demands systemic policy changes for fair STEM learning opportunities for all students.

School reform emphasizes transferring decision-making power to individual schools, seen in districts like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and beyond California. Principals gain control over budgets, curricula, schedules, and professional development, aiming to enhance student learning. Yet, the impact of this decentralization on school performance remains largely unknown. In Chicago, a study of an autonomy program revealed increased reading proficiency among elementary students after two years, but no significant gains in math or overall achievement scores. Principals leaned toward autonomy in budgets and curricula. Policy suggestions arise: policymakers must allow time for schools to adapt to autonomy, understanding improvements might not be immediate. They should also avoid neglecting high- or low-achieving students in pursuit of proficiency rates, affecting school evaluations. Further research is crucial to understand how decentralized control affects academic performance, examining how school leaders leverage autonomy to assess its potential for improving schools.

Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) incur significantly higher educational costs due to mandated services, yet face higher suspension rates, lower academic proficiency, and higher dropout rates. However, the selection of accommodations, modifications, and interventions lacks clarity and evidence of effectiveness. A comprehensive literature review identified 68 potential accommodations for EBD/ADHD students, but only 18 studies covering 12 strategies were found, with limited evidence supporting their efficacy. Notably, the widely used strategy of extended time showed no significant benefit and may potentially harm students with ADHD. Recommendations call for policymakers to clarify federal mandates, define accommodations, and promote evidence-based selections. They advocate for increased funding and rigorous research to determine effective interventions and emphasize implementing competency-building interventions alongside accommodations. Adoption of models prioritizing student competency, like the Life Course Model, is encouraged for policymakers and educators to streamline effective accommodation selection. These steps aim to bridge the gap between policy, research, and effective implementation to better support students with EBD/ADHD.

Proponents support school choice to enhance education, but research often overlooks its impact on school practices and achievement. A new study delves into whether charter school proximity influences school practices and its relation to math and reading achievement using Early Childhood Longitudinal Study data. Results show minimal impact on school practices based on charter proximity. Closer schools reported lower teacher absenteeism and better-aligned instruction, yet these changes did not remarkably affect reading or math achievement. Contrary to beliefs, charter growth does not appear to prompt organizational shifts in public schools due to entrenched cultural norms. Similarities between charter and public schools overshadow differences, hindering learning exchanges. Moreover, charters in disadvantaged areas may lack resources to impact public school competition. This study questions the efficacy of market-driven approaches in addressing educational challenges. Understanding the connection between competition, school practices, and student achievement is vital for directing policy initiatives effectively.

The concern over charter schools potentially excluding low-performing students has sparked debate. Analyzing a major urban district's data, researchers studied exit patterns suggesting such exclusions. Explicit evidence of schools expelling low-performing students is hard to find. Subtle methods like counseling or strict disciplinary actions might influence exits. While research is unable to confirm reasons for student transfers, data analysis did not support the claim that charter schools push out low-performing students more than traditional public schools. The study also found exiting charter students had lower performance, similar to those leaving traditional public schools. Analytical analyses, considering student characteristics, did not show evidence supporting the notion that charter schools disproportionately expel low-performing students. While findings counter the claim within our district, they are not conclusive for all settings. Variations may exist elsewhere. The researchers advocate for evidence-based discussions around charter schools, stressing the need for empirical backing before making or accepting claims about their student retention practices.

The United States witnesses frequent school changes among children due to various reasons, contributing to stress and educational disruption, especially among marginalized groups. Scholars suggest schools should foster better relationships with families to minimize unnecessary mobility, yet these strategies often lack rigorous testing. Researchers evaluated the Families and Schools Together (FAST) intervention's impact on reducing mobility by enhancing parent-school relations in low-income Hispanic elementary schools. Overall, the intervention didn't significantly lower mobility rates, with 35-45% of students changing schools. However, for Black families in the intervention, mobility dropped notably, aligning with other groups. The study underscores that school mobility hinges on diverse reasons; while socioeconomic factors might limit interventions' effectiveness, dissatisfaction or social isolation could be mitigated by fostering stronger school-family ties.

States moved from assessing students' proficiency to using growth models to track academic progress. Researchers analyzed three growth models in a California district, finding more prediction errors for English learners (ELs) than non-ELs. The models often misjudged ELs as remaining non-proficient by 7th grade when they were proficient. This error was more frequent for ELs (16–28%) than non-ELs (13–17%). ELs' steeper learning trajectories might explain this discrepancy; their growth is faster despite early low scores due to language support needs. These model inaccuracies have policy implications, potentially causing unnecessary interventions and not crediting effective instruction in early grades. They could influence the selection of accountability models, especially for student subgroups. Although California hasn't implemented growth-based accountability, it's part of the Smarter Balanced Assessment plans. Notably, the LA Times used a growth model to evaluate teachers, a contentious practice in education due to concerns about validity. The study's evidence questions any model's validity assuming uniform student growth without considering a teacher's student demographics.

The Coleman Report highlighted the strong link between school socioeconomic composition (SEC) and student achievement, supported by subsequent research. However, little focus has been given to school segregation's impact on student attainment, critical for future life outcomes. A new study in the American Educational Research Journal aimed to bridge this gap by examining 10th graders from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. The findings revealed that high SEC schools significantly correlated with higher high school graduation and college enrollment rates, with a 68% greater likelihood for 4-year college enrollment. Peer influence and school emphasis on academics emerged as key mechanisms, showcasing positive influences in high SEC schools but negative impacts in low SEC ones. However, low SEC schools often struggle with student disorder linked to their demographics. Addressing the effects of SEC on attainment requires altering school demographics, necessitating integration by resolving structural barriers. While large-scale busing isn't viable, incentivizing neighborhood integration could facilitate successful school integration, allowing states and municipalities to embrace integration plans willingly.

Research largely opposes grade retention due to its negative effects on students academically and developmentally. While this impact on retained students is well-documented, little attention has focused on how retention affects non-retained classmates. a new study delves into the influence of retained classmates on the absence behavior of non-retained students in urban schools. It utilizes a large dataset from an entire school district, finding that a higher percentage of retained classmates correlates with increased absences among non-retained students, particularly unexcused absences, suggesting potential academic disengagement. These results emphasize the need for California to proactively document retention effects and craft supportive policies, crucial for success, especially in high-needs urban schools where retention practices persist despite their potential negative impact.

In California, income-based reading gaps persist. Summer reading programs, including home-based ones, combat the "summer slide." A meta-analysis of 35 studies shows they enhance reading, especially comprehension. School-based programs with research-based strategies notably impact comprehension scores. Low-income students benefit more, perhaps due to differing summer learning loss patterns. Control group students from higher-income backgrounds gain reading scores over summer, contrasting with stable or declining scores for low-income peers, magnifying program effects. However, benefits diminish over time for all. The analysis supports summer programs for literacy. While both school-based and home-based approaches seem equally effective overall, school-based methods stand out with research-based strategies. Despite initial advantages, low-income students also experience fading effects. Addressing this fade-out and ensuring year-round support become crucial for sustaining summer gains.

Researchers spotlight the importance of evaluating the progress of English Learners (ELs), those Reclassified as Fluent English Proficient (RFEPs), and their combined group. An inherent issue emerges: successful RFEPs are often excluded from EL progress assessments due to their reclassification. Analyzing 2010 California data reveals critical insights: RFEPs constitute a significant portion of initially classified ELs (IELs), demonstrating the underestimation of the IEL population when focusing solely on current ELs. Additionally, RFEPs' achievements closely align with English-only students (EOs), suggesting an exaggerated achievement gap between EOs and IELs when RFEPs are omitted. Furthermore, neglecting RFEPs hinders recognizing positive trends; their increasing numbers and enhanced English Language Arts proficiency between 2005 and 2010 remain unnoticed. Policy suggestions emphasize the consistent inclusion of RFEPs in progress assessments to ensure accurate evaluations, especially within federal mandates like the Common Core Initiative.

In California, student mobility disrupts education for both students and educators, especially in urban schools serving disadvantaged communities. A recent study delves into the Success for All (SFA) program's effectiveness, focusing on early literacy skills for grades K–5. Research utilized a large-scale trial's unique setup to assess SFA's impact on later elementary grades (3–5) by comparing schools implementing SFA in different grade clusters. Surprisingly, the study found no positive or negative effects of SFA in grades 3–5 compared to standard instruction. This contradicts the program's previously observed positive effects in earlier grades from the same trial. These findings suggest that strategies successful in early grades might not seamlessly translate to later ones. However, it is important to note that this study's setup does not mirror the intended SFA implementation. Still, it echoes the experiences of many mobile students who begin in later grades at new schools. The paper concludes that more research is necessary to understand how schools can better support mobile students, emphasizing the need for improved instructional designs in later elementary years, despite earlier successes.

Researchers explore the impact of class diversity on cross-racial interaction in higher education, particularly pertinent in states post-affirmative action bans like California. While class diversity indirectly influenced interactions, racial diversity had a direct effect. Interacting across class lines correlated with greater racial interaction, but class diversity alone did not ensure robust engagement with racial diversity. A new study finds that despite a relationship between race and class diversity, they are not interchangeable. Racial diversity's impact was not overshadowed by class diversity, indicating its distinct influence on cross-racial interaction. Class diversity, coupled with racial diversity, was noted to challenge racial barriers and enhance conditions for interracial contact, aligning with Gordon Allport's contact theory. In California's higher education, threats to diversity arise from limited state funding and increased out-of-state enrollments. Despite enrolling many Pell Grant recipients, racial diversity remains limited, highlighted in legal cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas. The study underscores the crucial role of both class and racial diversity in preparing students for engagement in a diverse society and contributing to civic good.

Policymakers aim to boost four-year college attendance for disadvantaged students who often end up in less advantageous two-year colleges. Navigating complex college procedures without parental guidance poses challenges. Traditional counseling falls short due to time constraints and individualized approaches. Chicago Public Schools introduced a coaching model focusing solely on postsecondary plans, engaging students proactively, fostering relationships, and utilizing group sessions. Studying students post-high school revealed gaps in the enrollment process, especially among Latino and low-SES students. Encouraging completion of college-related tasks bridged these gaps, increasing specific plans and enrollment chances. Schools with coaches saw higher rates of students attending four-year colleges, particularly benefiting low-SES and Latino students. However, questions linger about neglecting high achievers, early intervention's impact, and long-term college persistence effects. New research underscores that group advising, like the coach program, may enhance educational outcomes for disadvantaged students, promising potential improvements in the future.

Career and technical education (CTE) battles outdated perceptions as a fallback for struggling students. Despite national academic reforms, CTE has evolved, emphasizing college and career readiness through blended academic and technical skills. Federal initiatives like the Perkins Acts transformed CTE into a broader curriculum, aiming to equip students with various skills through career clusters and integrated courses. Analyzing over 7,000 students' transcripts, a recent study found that those taking occupational CTE courses alongside academics showed similar math learning gains to those solely in academic courses. This challenges expectations of CTE's academic impact, particularly amidst initiatives like the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), which emphasize academics and integration. The study questions CTE's effectiveness in improving math learning and suggests the need for refined courses that better reinforce academic skills. It prompts a reevaluation of federal investments in CTE, highlighting the necessity for alignment with evolving academic standards to benefit students' overall educational outcomes.

California, a pioneer in school-based accountability, established the Academic Performance Index (API) in 1999, encompassing subjects and graduation rates. With the move past No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the state aims to enhance the API by embracing student growth, college readiness, and broader academic and social objectives. A RAND study identified additional measures adopted by 20 states, expanding beyond NCLB requirements, including student performance in extra subjects, growth over time, performance indices, and college readiness indicators. Emerging measures cover safe school environments, graduation risk, and interim assessments. RAND suggests customized local indicators, aligned incentives, supportive teaching structures, local validation studies, and collaborative statewide systems to foster comprehensive data collection and decision-making. As the Common Core assessments approach, the paradigm shifts towards redefining student achievement measurement, urging a holistic approach to data collection to inform stakeholders effectively.

In response to the No Child Left Behind Act, discourse around "failing schools" disproportionately affects minoritized communities, sidelining broader educational visions and eroding arts from public school learning. California's arts programs suffer, with 89% of K–12 schools lacking consistent arts education. This scarcity predominantly affects minoritized youth, amplifying disparities in resource-deprived schools, denying these students the qualitative problem-solving and social growth inherent in arts engagement. Advocating for arts and diversity education reform, a new study urges reconsideration of teachers' attitudes toward arts and challenges limited perspectives on students' experiences. Researchers emphasize the transformative potential of arts as a tool for minoritized school reform, fostering agency and cultural representation for impacted communities. The study dismantles the term "minority," advocating for a reimagining of multicultural education as universally designed to cater to all communities' needs. Researchers further propose leveraging arts as research tools to comprehend classroom dynamics and family roles within school communities, redefining research purposes and literacy values in K–12 education. The study ultimately calls for open engagement and dialogues involving minoritized and majoritized youth to underscore the potential impact of arts in research, curriculum, and pedagogy, challenging binary thinking and inviting exploration toward equitable, hopeful futures for all.

In recent years, budget cuts led to increased class sizes across the US. California notably saw a 20% rise, adding over 4 students per class between 2009–2010. This sparks debate on allocating limited resources, with class size at its core due to its impact on educational costs. Studies on class size effects show inconsistent, modest benefits. Although reducing class size incurred substantial costs in the past, raising it could mitigate harm amid budget cuts. California's prior investment in smaller classes yielded limited effects due to swift implementation. Rising class sizes’ impact depends on implementation; layoffs based on teacher effectiveness might counteract negative effects on student achievement. The debate centers on balancing budgets without compromising student learning, especially crucial amid fiscal challenges in education.

English language learners (ELLs) surge in K–12 enrollment, especially in regions with historically low numbers of ELLs, intensifying the shortage of qualified bilingual/ESL teachers in states like Arizona. Budget constraints push ELLs into mainstream classrooms, often lacking specialized teachers, with nearly 50% receiving minimal or no special services due to limited teacher certification. A new study debates the necessity of specialists for this population, advocating for their effectiveness in nurturing language, literacy, and content development. Specialized training must embrace ELLs' linguistic and cultural contributions to content learning, encourage multilingual practices, and counter negative narratives. Arizona’s generic training for all teachers shows no positive impact, whereas states like California and Illinois requiring specialist training witness improved classroom outcomes. Specialist training is pivotal for equitable and effective instruction for ELLs.

In a recent study of Head Start's impact on early childhood education, a meta-analysis reviewed 28 studies from 1965 to 2007. Head Start yielded a 0.27 effect size, indicating modest improvement in children's short-term cognitive outcomes, aligning with general early childhood education programs. Yet, its effects were smaller compared to more intensive programs like Perry Preschool, but within the range of wider ECE averages. Research design significantly influenced these outcomes, particularly the nature of the control group. Studies with an "active" control group, exposed to other forms of ECE, showed smaller effects than those with a "passive" group, receiving no alternative ECE. As ECE attendance rises, communities with multiple ECE options could produce smaller Head Start effects. This does not question Head Start's efficacy but highlights other effective ECE alternatives, skewing comparative evaluations. Skills closely tied to ECE curricula, like early reading and math, responded better to Head Start than broader cognitive skills, suggesting tempered expectations for effects on measures like vocabulary or IQ. Finally, the study emphasizes considering measurement quality when interpreting program evaluation outcomes.