PACE research is prominently featured in the repository on chronic absenteeism established by the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE). The collaborative serves as a valuable resource hub, offering toolkits, materials, and various other assets related to chronic absenteeism in educational settings. PACE's contribution to this repository includes two research briefs focusing on chronic absenteeism. The first brief involves PACE's in-depth analysis of student chronic absenteeism data from the CORE Districts, exploring the utilization of chronic absence metrics within a multi-metric accountability system. The second brief delves into the chronic absence performance levels of California's districts, schools, and student groups, utilizing recently released data from California's School Dashboard. This brief also investigates the pivotal role played by chronic absence in determining differentiated assistance, providing insights into the impact on school performance. Together, these research briefs offer valuable perspectives and data-driven insights into addressing and understanding chronic absenteeism in the context of California's educational landscape.

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) revolutionized school assessment by emphasizing a comprehensive approach over No Child Left Behind's (NCLB) test-focused model. California shifted from NCLB's single-number school ratings to a multi-dimensional dashboard system to better assess school performance. However, ESSA's current draft regulations advocate for a single, summative rating for identifying struggling schools, contradicting the spirit of multiple measures. The approach of condensing diverse measures into one rating would yield misleading outcomes. For instance, PACE found that schools performing poorly on one indicator might fare well on others. Such simplification fails to identify struggling schools accurately, a crucial step for offering necessary support. PACE recommends a tiered approach, considering each indicator separately, rather than amalgamating them into a single score. California's pursuit of a detailed, dashboard-style accountability system aligns with this approach, offering a more nuanced understanding of school performance and supporting tailored improvement strategies. A dashboard not only informs parents better but also enables informed decisions on school choices, focusing on continuous improvement rather than misleading rankings.

A new study challenges the prevailing belief that improving school climate and reducing violence directly lead to enhanced academic performance. Analyzing data from California schools over time, it suggests a different causal relationship: improved academic performance appears to drive reduced violence and a better school climate, rather than the reverse. These findings underscore the importance of integrating social-emotional, climate, and violence reduction programs into broader academic reforms rather than treating them as separate entities. The study highlights the necessity of further research in diverse settings using both quantitative and qualitative methods to understand this causal process thoroughly. It emphasizes that schools striving for academic improvement should consider addressing issues of climate and victimization as part of their academic reform efforts, highlighting the potential positive impact on teacher-student relationships. Additionally, the study proposes integrating measures of climate, violence, and academics within state accountability systems, aligning with the Every Student Succeeds Act, to support school improvement initiatives. Such an integrated approach, the study argues, will not only enhance academic outcomes but also ensure student safety, support well-being, and foster positive behaviors.

Michael W. Kirst discusses the new federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the CA overhaul of accountability based on local control of education policy. The federal law requires multiple measures for accountability, including some with state choice. Databases for English learners will change significantly. Federal requirements for teacher evaluation will be deregulated significantly. State assessments are all over the place and will be hard to summarize. California is building an integrated federal/state/local accountability system that includes 23 metrics, primarily for local use in Local Control Accountability Plans (LCAP) that focus on improving budget strategy. Longitudinal data bases from the past will be difficult to integrate with these policy shifts.

New research into the substantial population of current and former English learners (ELs), making up 40% of California's public-school attendees, emphasizes the vital need for equitable policies promoting both English proficiency and academic success among ELs. The study explores effective strategies concerning EL reclassification, use of native language, core curriculum access, and assessment. The research sheds light on the average duration for reclassification from EL to fluent English proficiency, highlighting the potential benefits of bilingual education programs over English immersion regarding reclassification rates. Researchers advocate for alignment between reclassification criteria and English proficiency constructs, stressing the importance of coordinated services during the EL and Fluent English Proficient (FEP) stages. Additionally, the study underscores the positive impact of bilingual education and dual immersion programs on EL academic outcomes while emphasizing the necessity for fair assessment accommodations, acknowledging potential biases in standardized tests and the significance of tailored accommodations for EL students. This comprehensive approach aims to guide policymakers and educators toward diverse policies and services for enhancing EL academic achievements.

Researchers explore the effectiveness of different preschool pathways for low-income children, specifically comparing Head Start and state pre-kindergarten (pre–k) programs. They assess the impact of funding two years of Head Start versus a combination of one year of Head Start followed by one year of pre–k. Analyzing data from an Oklahoma pre–k study, the team investigates the outcomes of children who experienced Head Start at age 3 transitioning to pre–k at age 4 against those who continued Head Start at age 4. Their findings reveal that children attending Head Start at age 3 and moving to pre-k at age 4 exhibit stronger pre-reading skills than those in Head Start at age 4. Notably, the effect of pre–k on early reading skills exceeds that of Head Start by a significant margin. The difference in program design and curriculum experiences at age 4 seems to influence these variations in skill development. The study emphasizes the importance of exploring these preschool pathways further across diverse program settings to comprehend their distinct impacts and the underlying reasons for their effectiveness.

The academic performance gap between English learners (ELs) and non-ELs is significant, roughly a standard deviation in math and reading. There has been a debate on bilingual versus English-only education for ELs, with limited rigorous research. Researchers have recently addressed this by analyzing a large urban district's data, tracking 13,750 EL students from kindergarten through middle school. They compared four EL instructional programs (transitional bilingual, developmental bilingual, dual immersion, English immersion) and their impact on ELs' academic growth in English Language Arts (ELA) and math. Using robust methods that controlled for parental preferences in school selection, researchers found that all bilingual programs show at least equal or better growth in ELA scores compared to English immersion, with dual immersion having the strongest effect. In math, all programs except developmental bilingual show positive growth. Additionally, Latino ELs perform better in bilingual programs than Chinese ELs. Initial English proficiency didn't impact program effectiveness. These findings emphasize the potential of well-designed bilingual programs, especially for Latino ELs, suggesting the importance of reconsidering state bans on bilingual education in public schools to better serve ELs and their communities.

In recent years, interest has grown in school-based interventions targeting executive function to boost academic success. Executive function, crucial for goal-oriented behavior in academics, has shown correlations with weaker academic performance, notably in reading and math. However, uncertainties persist regarding a direct causal relationship. A comprehensive review of 67 studies revealed a moderate link between executive function and academic success, especially in K-12 reading and math. Yet, when accounting for background factors like socioeconomic status or parental education, only a few connections remained robust, suggesting a less straightforward association. While interventions displayed potential in enhancing executive function, they lacked substantial evidence directly connecting these improvements to academic progress. More thorough research is crucial to definitively establish whether enhancing executive function translates into improved academic performance before implementing widespread school programs.

Community colleges, serving diverse student bodies, often rely on placement tests to assess readiness for college-level coursework, resulting in roughly 80% of new California community college students enrolling in remedial classes. Concerns about accuracy and low completion rates associated with tests like ACCUPLACER and COMPASS have prompted a push for reforms, leading to various experimental changes in college placement policies. A new study explores these policy shifts, comparing the use of MDTP diagnostics with ACCUPLACER, uncovering that the switch negatively impacted remediation, causing fewer students to advance through math sequences and a rise in severe placement errors, indicating increased misplacement rates. Conversely, minor adjustments to placement cutoffs demonstrated no significant effects. Recommendations advocate for integrating MDTP diagnostics into placement policies, exploring lower placement cutoffs over higher ones due to the perceived lesser impact of under-placement compared to over-placement, and utilizing regression discontinuity for a more refined evaluation of placement impacts. These suggestions aim to optimize developmental math placement practices, leveraging diagnostic tools and cautiously adjusting cutoffs to bolster student success.

Researchers consider the transformative changes in teacher evaluation systems following the Race to the Top initiative, emphasizing the adoption of multiple performance measures such as value-added measures and classroom observations. While the majority of states and districts underwent revisions, California notably abstained from statewide reforms. Despite the spotlight on using student test scores, most teachers' ratings primarily stem from classroom observations, especially those teaching non-tested subjects. Initially lacking evidence, recent studies, notably the Excellence in Teaching Project in Chicago Public Schools, reveal that in-depth teacher evaluations focusing on classroom interactions can enhance teaching practices and, consequently, student outcomes. However, these advancements require substantial time commitments from observers, typically principals, and teachers, coupled with comprehensive training and ongoing support. Crucially, while these evaluations demonstrated positive impacts overall, schools facing lower performance and higher poverty witnessed less progress, underscoring the necessity for added resources and support. As California deliberates its evaluation system revisions, researchers urge policymakers to prioritize resources and support for comprehensive teacher evaluations, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering student achievement.

A new study delves into racial and ethnic disparities in academic achievement within California middle schools and their correlation with school climate, a concept encompassing safety, relationships, and participation opportunities. Analyzing data from the California School Climate, Health, and Learning Survey (Cal-SCHLS) across 754 middle schools, the research focuses on Black-White and Hispanic-White racial climate gaps. It identifies differences in students' perceptions of safety, relationships, and participation based on race within the same schools. Notably, Black students reported lower levels of safety and relationships compared to White peers, while Hispanic students experienced lower safety, relationships, and participation opportunities than their White counterparts. The study also links larger racial achievement gaps to corresponding disparities in perceived safety, relationships, and participation. It emphasizes the importance of considering subgroup-specific climates instead of a general school-level assessment. Particularly relevant for California's education system, which integrates school climate measures into its accountability systems, the study highlights the need for targeted action plans addressing diverse subgroup experiences to promote educational equity.

A study critically examines middle school educational disparities, particularly among racial minority groups. Despite desegregation efforts in Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS), racial segregation in schools and classrooms persisted in 1997. Investigating 8th-grade students' performance, the study found a correlation between racial segregation, classroom tracking, and standardized test scores. Even after accounting for family background and prior achievements, students placed in lower tracks showed lower test scores. Additionally, prolonged exposure to racially segregated schools and tracks resulted in declining academic performance, while attendance in desegregated schools improved outcomes for all students, regardless of their race or background. The study underscores the long-term consequences of segregation, emphasizing its role in perpetuating academic inequalities. While specific to CMS in 1997, the findings highlight the enduring impact of segregation on academic achievement, stressing the crucial need to address racial segregation and tracking in schools for comprehensive educational reform and equitable learning opportunities.

A new study investigates English Language Learners' (ELLs) proficiency development using nine years of student data from Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). It reveals that while speaking and listening proficiency in English is often achieved within two years, reaching literacy-based proficiency takes notably longer, varying from 4 to 7 years for different literacy measures. By middle school, three-fourths of ELLs have been reclassified and exited from English Language (EL) services, with the likelihood of reclassification peaking in upper elementary grades. However, students not reclassified by this phase become less likely to do so, with over 30% eventually qualifying for special education. The study indicates varying reclassification times influenced by factors like initial academic language proficiency in English and students' primary language. It suggests the need for additional enrichment services for secondary ELs and emphasizes the importance of early high-quality preschool programs for academic language proficiency. The findings advocate for data-informed redesigns of federal and state assessment systems to accommodate diverse language acquisition trajectories, ensuring equitable education for ELLs.

The push for scientific literacy has grown, driven by increasing STEM career demands. However, persistent gender and racial/ethnic disparities in science proficiency remain a concern. In a new study, using national data from Grade 3 to Grade 8, researchers find substantial science score gaps among racial/ethnic groups and genders. While the Black-White gap stayed consistent, the Hispanic-White gap narrowed, and the Asian-White gap vanished by eighth grade. Gender gaps slightly decreased but remained present. Yet, controlling for socioeconomic status, prior math/reading achievement, and classroom factors significantly reduced all eighth-grade science gaps, making them statistically insignificant. Notably, the gender gap closely aligns with math differences, and by controlling for math and reading achievement, SES, and classroom aspects, eighth-grade disparities diminish. The study highlights the need for early interventions to bridge these gaps and suggests further research into factors influencing science disparities for future equitable opportunities in STEM fields.

In the drive to intensify middle school math education by augmenting eighth-grade Algebra enrollment, California led the charge, making Algebra the 8th-grade math benchmark in 2008. Over nearly a decade, California witnessed a doubling in eighth-graders taking advanced math, reaching approximately 65%. The initiative aimed to bolster learning in challenging academic settings, grounded in research linking rigorous curricula to higher achievement. A new study delves into this policy's broad-reaching impact, analyzing California's K–12 public school data. We explore how increased 8th-grade Algebra enrollment affects 10th-grade math performance (CAHSEE). The analysis portrays a  discouraging picture, contradicting earlier beliefs. Broad efforts to increase 8th-grade Algebra enrollment negatively impact student achievement in larger districts and show no benefits in smaller or medium districts. Across math domains, these effects persist, from elementary concepts to more advanced subjects like Measurement and Geometry or Algebra I.

The Head Start program, established in 1965, aims to enhance the school readiness of low-income children by providing comprehensive services, including education, health, and family support. This approach targets children’s cognitive and socio-emotional development, health, and family well-being. Researchers using the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS) examined if the program effectively supports at-risk children. By creating risk factors based on the program model, they aimed to determine if Head Start benefits children with higher risk profiles. Results showed a mix of outcomes: while there was no significant improvement in high-risk children’s pre-academic skills, teacher-reported behavior problems were slightly reduced, contrasting with maternal-reported behavior problems, which increased. This suggests Head Start might better address behavioral aspects than pre-academic readiness. The study highlighted the need for better tailoring services to high-risk children, especially in cognitive development, indicating the importance of ongoing research to enhance Head Start's responsiveness to individual needs for better outcomes in school readiness.

Researchers conducted an experiment to determine if incentives could improve low-income students' attendance in tutoring programs provided through Supplemental Education Services (SEdS). Three groups of 5th-8th graders were formed: one offered a $100 reward for regular attendance, another receiving certificates of recognition, and a control group without incentives. Surprisingly, the monetary reward didn't increase attendance, while the certificate group attended 40% more sessions than the control. This contrasts with past studies showing monetary incentives for improved test scores as ineffective, suggesting that mere rewards may not enhance skills without additional support. The certificate approach proved cost-effective, costing $9 per student versus $100 for the monetary incentive. However, wider implementation's effectiveness might diminish due to students' varied perceptions of recognition's value, related to existing academic achievements or repeated rewards. The study's success suggests non-monetary incentives are effective and inexpensive. Policymakers and educators seeking to boost student participation in underutilized programs should consider these findings, emphasizing nuanced research into varying incentives' effectiveness and cost-efficiency to motivate student engagement. Despite these promising results, a comprehensive solution requires a deeper understanding of how different incentives affect diverse student populations and their sustained impact over time.

A meta-analysis of 53 cases from 34 publications aimed to understand the impact of school suspensions on student outcomes. It found a consistent negative link between suspensions, particularly out-of-school ones, and academic achievement. Additionally, though data was limited, out-of-school suspension showed a positive association with dropout rates. Factors like gender, race, and socio-economic status influenced these relationships, indicating varied impacts on different groups. The study refrains from making causal conclusions, but it suggests that suspensions might contribute to lower achievement due to reduced learning opportunities and disengagement from school. Disproportionate suspension rates among low-income, urban, and minority students raise equity concerns. Encouragingly, California's limitations on suspension for minor disruptions might be a progressive step. The study advocates for evidence-based strategies focusing on behavior improvement, alternatives to suspension, better educator training, and consistent review of disciplinary data for informed decision-making to reduce suspension rates and their negative impacts on students.

Schools face the dual responsibility of educating children and providing health services to over a million students in California with special health care needs (SHCN). These students are at higher risk of academic struggles and absenteeism. However, schools often lack awareness of these students’ conditions, neglecting their unique health needs. The absence of specific regulations leaves decisions about health services and staffing to individual districts. Alarmingly, 57% of districts in 2013 had no school nurses, while those with nurses had ratios far exceeding recommended levels. In the absence of nurses, unlicensed staff handle critical health procedures. The lack of state guidance and dedicated funding exacerbates these challenges. To address this, California should mandate systematic identification and care for students with SHCN, track health emergencies, monitor attendance and educational outcomes, and ensure standardized training for all staff delivering health services. These steps could safeguard the health and academic success of all students, aligning with the proven link between health and academic performance.

Test-based accountability has become standard in education, with 16 states and the District of Columbia mandating the retention of third-grade students falling below reading benchmarks. Grade retention has been debated for years; supporters argue it boosts future achievement, while critics highlight its emotional toll. In “Hold Back to Move Forward? Early Grade Retention and Student Misbehavior,” I delve into an often-overlooked aspect: the impact of retention on disruptive behavior. Determining causality in retention policies is complex, as decisions aren’t random but based on unobservable student traits. To tackle this, I leverage Florida’s policy, analyzing students just below and above the promotion cutoff in a regression framework. A new study reveals short-term effects of retention on increased misbehavior, rising by 40% in the two years post-retention, predominantly among economically disadvantaged and male students. However, these effects fade after three years. Despite short-term academic gains, retention bears the cost of escalated misbehavior. These findings prompt a reevaluation of test-based retention policies that offer instructional support, like California’s, weighing their benefits against the behavioral implications.

School districts have adopted the four-day school week to curb budget deficits, particularly in rural regions like Colorado and Wyoming, with around 10 districts in California following suit by 2011. This schedule change raises questions about its impact on academic performance. Longer class periods allow varied teaching methods and teacher planning, possibly improving student morale and behavior. Yet, concerns arise about teacher stress, student retention, and increased fatigue, especially for younger students. Evaluating this shift rigorously is vital, but few studies exist. Using a difference-in-differences regression and data from Colorado’s CSAP, researchers analyzed 4th-grade reading and 5th-grade math scores in districts that switched to a four-day week against those on standard schedules. Over a third of Colorado districts adopted this schedule. The results showed a significant increase in math scores post-switch, and while reading scores also rose, the change wasn’t statistically significant. The findings suggest no harm to student performance and even hint at improved attendance rates, though they apply primarily to smaller, rural districts, warranting caution in applying these findings more broadly.

Amid budget constraints and the need for a skilled workforce, policymakers explore ways to increase post-secondary education. Barriers for low-income students include achievement, financial, and informational hurdles. Previous research tackled financial obstacles, but recent attention focuses on information barriers. Researchers analyzed if ACT score reports, signaling college readiness in subjects, influenced college enrollment decisions among Colorado students. By comparing those near readiness cutoffs, we assessed the impact of this information. Surprisingly, they found no influence on college enrollment. This could stem from the students' status (near readiness thresholds) or the information’s lack of application guidance. Possible reasons for this could be students already knowing their readiness, the information not being highlighted, or coming too late for impactful changes. These findings suggest the need for clearer, timely, and supported information interventions to drive students’ college-going decisions.

In the U.S., school performance is a pressing concern, leading to policies like grade retention for struggling students. Several factors influence retention, including poverty, behavioral issues, and academic struggles. However, methodological flaws in previous studies have hindered a clear understanding of these predictors. A new study used robust methods and data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Kindergarten Cohort to analyze grade retention predictors. It found that academic readiness, particularly in reading, math, and general knowledge, strongly influenced retention, surpassing previously identified risk factors like ethnicity, English proficiency, and poverty. Interestingly, once readiness was considered, these traditional risk factors showed no significant influence. Notably, grade retention tended to occur most often by third grade. Researchers provide crucial insights for educators and policymakers to identify and support at-risk students earlier, emphasizing the importance of academic readiness in preventing grade retention.