Gauging Growth

How to Judge No Child Left Behind?
Bruce Fuller
University of California, Berkeley
Joseph Wright
Policy Analysis for California Education
Kathryn Gesicki
Policy Analysis for California Education
Erin Kang
State University of New York


As Congress reconsiders the federal government’s role in school reform, many policymakers feel pressure to claim that No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is boosting student performance. But how should politicians and activists gauge NCLB’s effects? In this article, the authors offer evidence on three barometers of student performance, drawing from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and state data spanning 1992–2006. Focusing on the performance of fourth graders, where gains have been strongest since the early 1970s, the authors find that earlier test score growth has largely faded since enactment of NCLB in 2002. Gains in math achievement have persisted in the post-NCLB period, albeit at a slower rate of growth. Performance in many states continues to apparently climb. But compared with the NAEP definition, the bar defining proficiency is set much lower in most states and the disparity between state and federal results has grown since 2001. Progress seen in the 1990s in narrowing achievement gaps has largely disappeared in the post-NCLB era.

This article was originally published in Educational Researcher by SAGE Publications.

Suggested citationFuller, B., Wright, J., Gesicki, K. & Kang, W. (2007, June). Gauging growth: How to judge No Child Left Behind? [Article]. Policy Analysis for California Education.