Principal turnover in the United States has become a pressing issue, with as many as 18% exiting schools annually, associated with detrimental effects like reduced student achievement and increased teacher turnover. While previous studies have focused on predictive models assuming a single type of exiting principal, this research delved into the 2007–08 Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) and the 2008–09 Principal Follow-up Survey (PFS) from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) to identify distinct categories among exiting principals: "Satisfied" and "Disaffected." Satisfied principals, comprising around two-thirds of exits, displayed high satisfaction, influence, and minimal school climate issues. In contrast, Disaffected principals, about one-third of exits, reported lower influence, negative attitudes, and more climate problems. Specifically, Disaffected principals felt restricted in setting curriculum and standards, lacked enthusiasm for their role, and often considered transferring out. The study highlights that universal approaches to address turnover might not effectively target the Disaffected minority, suggesting the need for tailored strategies to combat principal turnover.

A new study focuses on the anticipated advantages of charter schools compared to public schools, particularly in terms of teacher autonomy and accountability. While the charter school system was envisioned to provide educators with more freedom and responsibility, this research sought to verify these assumptions. Analyzing teacher survey data, the study found that teachers in charter schools indeed experienced more autonomy than those in public schools. However, there was no significant disparity in how accountable they felt. Interestingly, within the charter school realm, teachers in schools run by Educational Management Organizations (EMOs) reported less autonomy compared to teachers in independent charter schools, with a parallel level of accountability. The research suggests that excessive administrative red tape, especially prevalent in public schools and EMO-run charters, may hinder teacher autonomy. This raises concerns about the accountability aspect of the charter school arrangement and calls for improvements in both sectors. Public schools might benefit from reducing unnecessary administrative burdens to enhance teacher autonomy, while charter schools, especially EMO-run ones, need to address issues hindering teacher independence and accountability fulfillment.

Michael W. Kirst discusses the new federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the CA overhaul of accountability based on local control of education policy. The federal law requires multiple measures for accountability, including some with state choice. Databases for English learners will change significantly. Federal requirements for teacher evaluation will be deregulated significantly. State assessments are all over the place and will be hard to summarize. California is building an integrated federal/state/local accountability system that includes 23 metrics, primarily for local use in Local Control Accountability Plans (LCAP) that focus on improving budget strategy. Longitudinal data bases from the past will be difficult to integrate with these policy shifts.

New research into the substantial population of current and former English learners (ELs), making up 40% of California's public-school attendees, emphasizes the vital need for equitable policies promoting both English proficiency and academic success among ELs. The study explores effective strategies concerning EL reclassification, use of native language, core curriculum access, and assessment. The research sheds light on the average duration for reclassification from EL to fluent English proficiency, highlighting the potential benefits of bilingual education programs over English immersion regarding reclassification rates. Researchers advocate for alignment between reclassification criteria and English proficiency constructs, stressing the importance of coordinated services during the EL and Fluent English Proficient (FEP) stages. Additionally, the study underscores the positive impact of bilingual education and dual immersion programs on EL academic outcomes while emphasizing the necessity for fair assessment accommodations, acknowledging potential biases in standardized tests and the significance of tailored accommodations for EL students. This comprehensive approach aims to guide policymakers and educators toward diverse policies and services for enhancing EL academic achievements.

Researchers explore the effectiveness of different preschool pathways for low-income children, specifically comparing Head Start and state pre-kindergarten (pre–k) programs. They assess the impact of funding two years of Head Start versus a combination of one year of Head Start followed by one year of pre–k. Analyzing data from an Oklahoma pre–k study, the team investigates the outcomes of children who experienced Head Start at age 3 transitioning to pre–k at age 4 against those who continued Head Start at age 4. Their findings reveal that children attending Head Start at age 3 and moving to pre-k at age 4 exhibit stronger pre-reading skills than those in Head Start at age 4. Notably, the effect of pre–k on early reading skills exceeds that of Head Start by a significant margin. The difference in program design and curriculum experiences at age 4 seems to influence these variations in skill development. The study emphasizes the importance of exploring these preschool pathways further across diverse program settings to comprehend their distinct impacts and the underlying reasons for their effectiveness.

A current study analyzes the outcomes of students in Washington State's Community and Technical Colleges over seven years after enrollment. Researchers examine wage increases and employment patterns based on the type of credentials earned—short-term certificates, Associate Degrees, and Long-Term Certificates. The study highlights the significant economic benefits and enhanced employability associated with Associate Degrees and Long-Term Certificates, except for Humanities Associates Degrees, which show minimal wage increases. Interestingly, short-term certificates fail to contribute to increased wages or employment likelihood beyond earning college credits. The findings emphasize the need for prioritizing investment in credentials with higher market value, like Associate Degrees and Long-Term Certificates, despite their higher cost compared to short-term certificates. This is crucial, especially as there's been increased funding for short-term certificates despite their limited returns, as indicated in various state studies. Additionally, advocating for stackable short-term certificates to align with longer-term credentials could enhance the value of these programs. Lastly, efforts to guide students towards higher-return career pathways from the Humanities and Social Sciences, perhaps through early career awareness initiatives, are suggested.

Research on community college education, particularly for men from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, investigates the impact of different learning styles on academic success and course retention. Comparing face-to-face instruction with various online methods, findings reveal that Asian, Black, Latino, and White men generally fare better in traditional in-person classes. Online learning formats don't consistently outperform face-to-face instruction except for Black men, who show higher success rates with asynchronous learning involving multimedia. A new study highlights the effectiveness of in-person teaching for these students and recommends expanding online options while ensuring equitable success for diverse racial and ethnic groups. Given the significant proportion of community college students in California and the high representation of racial ethnic minorities, there is a need for special consideration when promoting online education among Asian, Black, Latino, and White men. Further research is urged to identify online teaching methods that replicate the benefits of face-to-face learning, focusing on variations in online material presentation and classroom interactions.

The academic performance gap between English learners (ELs) and non-ELs is significant, roughly a standard deviation in math and reading. There has been a debate on bilingual versus English-only education for ELs, with limited rigorous research. Researchers have recently addressed this by analyzing a large urban district's data, tracking 13,750 EL students from kindergarten through middle school. They compared four EL instructional programs (transitional bilingual, developmental bilingual, dual immersion, English immersion) and their impact on ELs' academic growth in English Language Arts (ELA) and math. Using robust methods that controlled for parental preferences in school selection, researchers found that all bilingual programs show at least equal or better growth in ELA scores compared to English immersion, with dual immersion having the strongest effect. In math, all programs except developmental bilingual show positive growth. Additionally, Latino ELs perform better in bilingual programs than Chinese ELs. Initial English proficiency didn't impact program effectiveness. These findings emphasize the potential of well-designed bilingual programs, especially for Latino ELs, suggesting the importance of reconsidering state bans on bilingual education in public schools to better serve ELs and their communities.

Over the past two decades, charter schools emerged as part of school reform efforts, providing parental choice in education. However, research highlights that despite their intended autonomy and innovation, charter schools have often failed to offer sustainable working conditions for teachers. A new study, focusing on a Los Angeles charter school organization, delves into teachers' experiences leading to unionization in 2005, aiming to understand why choice-based environments pushed educators towards collective action. Teachers described a vibrant yet exhausting professional setting, lacking job security and facing longer working hours compared to district teachers. Despite initial collaboration with school leaders, teachers felt unheard about their working conditions, prompting unionization discussions. Over 60% of teachers voted for a union, desiring sustainable working conditions and a voice in decision-making. However, the governing board resisted, perceiving the union as an impediment to their flexibility. The study emphasizes the struggle of charter school teachers for equitable working conditions and the significance of their collective actions in achieving sustainability. This research remains pertinent in understanding charter school challenges, as highlighted by recent unionization attempts and legal disputes in Los Angeles charter schools.