Policy brief
On Growth Models, Time for California to Show Some Improvement
![Growth Models](/sites/default/files/styles/cover_crop/public/2020-01/Growth%20Models.png?itok=XPzZ8Duj)
- Home
- Publications
- On Growth Models, Time for California to Show Some Improvement
Share
Author
Morgan Polikoff
University of Southern California
Published
Summary
California is one of just two states (with Kansas) that does not use a student-level growth model to measure school performance. This brief lays out a number of common beliefs about growth models and provides evidence that these beliefs are inaccurate or unsupported. In so doing, the brief makes a positive case that the state should adopt such a model and replace the current "change" metric in the California School Dashboard. Two specific models—student-growth percentiles and residual-gain growth models—would be a dramatic improvement over what the state currently uses and would much more validly identify schools succeeding and in need of support.
Suggested citation
Polikoff, M. (2019, September). On growth models, time for California to show some improvement [Policy brief]. Policy Analysis for California Education. https://edpolicyinca.org/publications/growth-models-time-california-show-improvement
Polikoff, M. (2019, September). On growth models, time for California to show some improvement [Policy brief]. Policy Analysis for California Education. https://edpolicyinca.org/publications/growth-models-time-california-show-improvement
Learn more about this initiative:
Learn more about these topics:
Related Publications
Related Commentaries
Measuring Student Academic Growth
Existing Models May Not Serve English Learner Students or Their Teachers
From the newsroom
October 28, 2019 | Ed100
October 9, 2019 | CalMatters
Pagination
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2