July 15, 2020 | Business Insider

The coronavirus pandemic could upend universities as we know them. While other economic downturns were a boon for graduate programs, especially at elite business schools where young professionals—at least, the ones who can afford to—could await a better employment prospects...

June 24, 2020 | Berkeley Blog

In a shot heard around the country, on May 21, 2020, UC’s Board of Regents suspended the requirement and use of standardized tests, including the SAT and ACT, for freshman applicants.  UC will be test optional for campus selection of...

April 29, 2020 | Partnership Schools

One of the most complicated issues facing teachers right now is how to assess and grade student work. As one Washington Post article noted this week, “There’s little consensus beyond the need to abandon the status quo.” Even in “normal”...

Publication Type
Commentary
Summary

As the UC Board of Regents approaches a crucial decision on the use of SAT and ACT in admissions, a faculty task force report has drawn criticism for distorting key issues and offering recommendations lacking substantial evidence or potential for improving admissions fairness or diversity across campuses. The report acknowledges problems with these tests but suggests a ten-year continuation without viable replacements, viewed as a waste of time and public funds. Three comprehensive analyses accompany this commentary, urging a reevaluation of the report's stance. They highlight concerns regarding heavy reliance on SAT scores affecting underrepresented groups, propose restructuring the Eligibility in the Local Context program for improved diversity, and advocate for considering Smarter Balanced assessments alongside GPA for fairer admissions. Criticizing the report's swift dismissal of valid options, the analyses emphasize aligning high school and university expectations while urging evidence-based decisions. This commentary seeks to steer the Regents' attention beyond the task force report, advocating for a more inclusive and thorough assessment of the available perspectives.