This study examines consolidation's impact on student achievement in California. It finds that consolidation leads to improved educational opportunities and cost savings. Consolidation benefits low-income and minority students and has a greater impact in rural areas. Although drawbacks exist, consolidation can be an effective strategy for enhancing education. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and education leaders seeking to improve student outcomes in their districts.

This report explores the role of accountability in school improvement and its potential drawbacks. While accountability can provide feedback, reorient action, and justify action, it can also lead to gross distortions and may not sufficiently incentivize teachers. The authors argue for a consensual view of the teacher's role and for parsimonious accountability schemes that enhance the quality of life among teachers. They propose design considerations that can improve the effectiveness of testing and controls to enhance the teaching profession.

California is at a critical juncture in education, needing up to 190,000 new teachers by 1991 and replacing 75% of the teaching force. Recommendations to improve teaching quality are proposed in this paper, focusing on changes in certification, professional training, and career structure. The state has the opportunity to ensure quality education for the 77 million students who will be taught by these new teachers.