May 17, 2001 | Daily Bruin

High school seniors around the country are feeling apathetic toward their classes during their final semester, which often carries over and negatively affects their freshman year of college. The epidemic, commonly known as “senioritis,” is the topic of a recent...

February 21, 2017 | EdSource

Three out of 10 of California’s 2016 high school graduates earned a score of 3 or higher in Advanced Placement tests, allowing them to earn college credit, according to new figures from the test’s publisher, the College Board. The state’s...

November 3, 2016 | Education Week

In school accountability, flashlights work better than hammers. That’s the oft-repeated argument of California’s CORE districts, a data collaborative now serving over 1.8-million students. It’s generally recognized that the practice of using data to bash schools—commonly known as naming and...

Commentary authors
Publication Type
Commentary
Summary

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) revolutionized school assessment by emphasizing a comprehensive approach over No Child Left Behind's (NCLB) test-focused model. California shifted from NCLB's single-number school ratings to a multi-dimensional dashboard system to better assess school performance. However, ESSA's current draft regulations advocate for a single, summative rating for identifying struggling schools, contradicting the spirit of multiple measures. The approach of condensing diverse measures into one rating would yield misleading outcomes. For instance, PACE found that schools performing poorly on one indicator might fare well on others. Such simplification fails to identify struggling schools accurately, a crucial step for offering necessary support. PACE recommends a tiered approach, considering each indicator separately, rather than amalgamating them into a single score. California's pursuit of a detailed, dashboard-style accountability system aligns with this approach, offering a more nuanced understanding of school performance and supporting tailored improvement strategies. A dashboard not only informs parents better but also enables informed decisions on school choices, focusing on continuous improvement rather than misleading rankings.

September 18, 2016 | EdSource

School districts and charter schools serving 1.7 million students in California will compile, analyze and compare data on student performance beyond what the state collects under a new agreement announced last week. The additional data will include information on school...

Commentary author
Publication Type
Commentary
Summary

California lawmakers are facing a challenge in how to effectively evaluate schools. Historically, schools have been assessed using a blended approach, combining various factors into a single score, much like blending different ingredients in a soup. However, this method obscures the specific performance details of each school and lacks guidance for improvement. California is moving towards a smarter accountability system resembling how students are evaluated, utilizing a dashboard to showcase eight state priorities. This dashboard provides insights into where schools excel and where they need improvement, considering factors like test score growth, safety, and parental engagement. Despite these efforts, federal regulations are pushing for a single school rating, similar to the outdated blended score method, which recent reports have found to be arbitrary and misleading. Advocates argue for simplicity, but a singular index oversimplifies complex school performance, underestimating parents' ability to comprehend nuanced evaluations. California seeks a more comprehensive and accurate school performance assessment system and urges flexibility from the federal government in designing effective evaluation methods.

August 13, 2016 | San Francisco Chronicle

The state of California, the federal government, and your local school district all agree - our lowest-performing schools need support and improvement. The problem is that every entity has its own idea about how to make changes. A conflict between...

August 2, 2016 | Education Week

When Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act in 2015, it was celebrated as relief from its predecessor, but as regulations emerge it’s beginning to look like its evil sibling of the discredited No Child Left Behind Act’s name-and-shame policy...