Researchers investigated the impact of the YMCA High School Youth Institute (YI) on low-income urban youth. The comprehensive, year-round program significantly improved the academic performance of participants compared to a matched comparison group. YI students demonstrated higher standardized test scores in English Language Arts and Math, improved attendance, and notably higher academic grades. The success of the YI program stemmed from its comprehensive structure, emphasizing positive youth development through supportive relationships, meaningful engagement, skill-building activities, and technology integration. Key strategies for such programs included diverse academic support such as daily homework assistance, college readiness programs, technology access, GPA-linked internships, and project-based learning aligned with state standards. These programs aimed to develop critical skills while nurturing creativity through hands-on, community-focused learning. Tailoring programs for low-income youth involved a focus on technology proficiency, critical thinking, problem-solving, and information accessibility. Incorporating these elements into out-of-school programs effectively attracts, retains, and positively influences the academic achievement of high schoolers from economically challenged backgrounds.

In the months leading up to high school graduation in California, seniors excitedly anticipate the transition to college or the workforce. However, unforeseen financial and procedural obstacles often jeopardize the college plans of diligent students, resulting in what's termed "summer melt." Research, drawing on national surveys and urban school district data, reveals that 10 to 40 percent of college-intending students fail to enroll after being accepted, especially impacting low-income students and perpetuating socioeconomic disparities. The complexities of post-acceptance tasks, primarily linked to college financing, pose significant barriers. Students face challenges securing additional funds to bridge financial aid gaps and navigating bureaucratic hurdles, lacking guidance during the crucial summer period. Fortunately, interventions during this time have shown promise. Low-cost initiatives, like counselor-led support and text messaging campaigns providing task reminders and links, yielded substantial enrollment increases of 5 to 15 percent. These summer interventions, notably cost-effective compared to other college supports, present a crucial opportunity to assist low-income students. By investing in targeted information and counseling during this window, substantial strides can be made in enhancing college access for these hardworking individuals.

American policymakers prioritize STEM education, yet many high school grads lack STEM readiness. Early science and math education is crucial for future success, suggesting a need for strong elementary STEM foundations. However, an analysis reveals a decline in weekly elementary science instruction, dropping from 3.0 to 2.3 hours between 1993–94 and 2007–08, with a shift towards math and language arts. California notably offered only 1.8 hours per week in 2007–08. More science class time correlated with higher grade 4 NAEP scores, indicating a 12-point difference between four and one-hour instruction. While time mattered, socioeconomic factors significantly impacted achievement disparities. This underscores the necessity of policy shifts at all education levels to ensure equitable science education. Addressing accountability’s influence on curricula and instruction across subjects is vital. Striking a balance and fostering equitable access to quality science education demands systemic policy changes for fair STEM learning opportunities for all students.

School reform emphasizes transferring decision-making power to individual schools, seen in districts like San Francisco (SFUSD), Los Angeles (LAUSD), and beyond California. Principals gain control over budgets, curricula, schedules, and professional development, aiming to enhance student learning. Yet, the impact of this decentralization on school performance remains largely unknown. In Chicago, a study of an autonomy program revealed increased reading proficiency among elementary students after two years, but no significant gains in math or overall achievement scores. Principals leaned toward autonomy in budgets and curricula. Policy suggestions arise: policymakers must allow time for schools to adapt to autonomy, understanding improvements might not be immediate. They should also avoid neglecting high- or low-achieving students in pursuit of proficiency rates, affecting school evaluations. Further research is crucial to understand how decentralized control affects academic performance, examining how school leaders leverage autonomy to assess its potential for improving schools.

Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) incur significantly higher educational costs due to mandated services, yet face higher suspension rates, lower academic proficiency, and higher dropout rates. However, the selection of accommodations, modifications, and interventions lacks clarity and evidence of effectiveness. A comprehensive literature review identified 68 potential accommodations for EBD/ADHD students, but only 18 studies covering 12 strategies were found, with limited evidence supporting their efficacy. Notably, the widely used strategy of extended time showed no significant benefit and may potentially harm students with ADHD. Recommendations call for policymakers to clarify federal mandates, define accommodations, and promote evidence-based selections. They advocate for increased funding and rigorous research to determine effective interventions and emphasize implementing competency-building interventions alongside accommodations. Adoption of models prioritizing student competency, like the Life Course Model, is encouraged for policymakers and educators to streamline effective accommodation selection. These steps aim to bridge the gap between policy, research, and effective implementation to better support students with EBD/ADHD.

Proponents support school choice to enhance education, but research often overlooks its impact on school practices and achievement. A new study delves into whether charter school proximity influences school practices and its relation to math and reading achievement using Early Childhood Longitudinal Study data. Results show minimal impact on school practices based on charter proximity. Closer schools reported lower teacher absenteeism and better-aligned instruction, yet these changes did not remarkably affect reading or math achievement. Contrary to beliefs, charter growth does not appear to prompt organizational shifts in public schools due to entrenched cultural norms. Similarities between charter and public schools overshadow differences, hindering learning exchanges. Moreover, charters in disadvantaged areas may lack resources to impact public school competition. This study questions the efficacy of market-driven approaches in addressing educational challenges. Understanding the connection between competition, school practices, and student achievement is vital for directing policy initiatives effectively.

Co-enrollment, attending multiple colleges simultaneously, notably in California's UC or CSU campuses, lacks extensive research on its varied impacts. A recent study focuses on vertical co-enrollment (mixing two- and four-year colleges) and lateral co-enrollment (attending same-level institutions). Vertical co-enrollment positively affected degree completion and persistence for students starting at four-year colleges and bachelor's-aspiring community college students. However, lateral co-enrollment didn't influence degree completion for either group. These findings hold relevance for California's higher education strategies. Vertical co-enrollment aids community college students in upward transfers to four-year institutions, facilitating smoother transitions and successful degree attainment. Strengthening collaboration between colleges, especially in course articulation, would ensure seamless transfers. Additionally, co-enrolling at community colleges benefits beginning four-year students, especially those seeking cost-effective education. These institutions play a crucial role in supporting students from four-year colleges to attain the necessary coursework for a bachelor's degree. It underscores the responsibility of community colleges in aiding co-enrolled students. Further exploration into nuances of co-enrollment, such as course selection motivations, is essential. This understanding can guide institutions in better serving co-enrolled students and tailoring programs to their needs.

Access to arts education in US public schools varies greatly and remains largely undocumented. The President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities highlighted this lack of data on offered courses, hindering policymakers' understanding. A recent study in Texas with data from 870 public high schools aimed to illustrate this variation by developing indices measuring arts education access. Surprisingly, schools with numerous arts courses didn’t always have high student engagement, and high participation rates often lacked diverse courses. Researchers suggest policymakers consider both course offerings and student engagement rates to accurately identify exceptional arts programs.Recommendations propose creating indices combining course offerings and participation rates in other states to address equity and ensure sufficient arts opportunities in public high schools. Additionally, California policymakers are urged to use their education databases, like the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System, to document arts education access. Furthermore, researchers propose a dialogue among educators, practitioners, and policymakers to define what constitutes an arts-rich school. Establishing standardized thresholds for course offerings and participation rates can ensure a more comprehensive understanding of arts education access. While incomplete, descriptions of course offerings and participation rates are crucial first steps toward understanding arts education access.

The concern over charter schools potentially excluding low-performing students has sparked debate. Analyzing a major urban district's data, researchers studied exit patterns suggesting such exclusions. Explicit evidence of schools expelling low-performing students is hard to find. Subtle methods like counseling or strict disciplinary actions might influence exits. While research is unable to confirm reasons for student transfers, data analysis did not support the claim that charter schools push out low-performing students more than traditional public schools. The study also found exiting charter students had lower performance, similar to those leaving traditional public schools. Analytical analyses, considering student characteristics, did not show evidence supporting the notion that charter schools disproportionately expel low-performing students. While findings counter the claim within our district, they are not conclusive for all settings. Variations may exist elsewhere. The researchers advocate for evidence-based discussions around charter schools, stressing the need for empirical backing before making or accepting claims about their student retention practices.

In the United States, adolescent literacy struggles have prompted concern, particularly in English Language Arts (ELA) classes where the focus shifts from literacy skills to literature concepts despite reading achievement concerns. Amidst the implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS), understanding reading development becomes pivotal for ELA teachers, yet discrepancies exist in state licensure requirements. A survey of State Educational Agencies (SEAs) revealed varied standards: only 18 SEAs, including California, mandated reading development knowledge for secondary ELA, with merely five testing this on licensure exams. Most SEAs emphasized content area reading strategies but did not evaluate this knowledge in licensure assessments. These discrepancies pose challenges in implementing CCSS uniformly, potentially hindering effective instruction for struggling adolescent readers in ELA classrooms across states. The prevalent emphasis on content area reading strategies might insufficiently equip ELA teachers to aid struggling adolescent readers, impacting the successful execution of the CCSS.

A new study assessed the effectiveness of after-school tutoring programs, specifically the Supplemental Educational Services (SES) under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), within Chicago Public Schools. Evaluating these SES providers from 2009 onwards, the research aimed to fairly measure their impact on student achievement by considering student characteristics and school settings. The findings indicated that participating in SES positively influenced student achievement, notably with over 40 hours of tutoring, contributing significantly to annual student gains. Interestingly, there was a decline in hourly rates among providers over time, which correlated with the district's program, and a clear link between provider effectiveness and the number of students served. Successful program attributes, such as effective oversight, coordination, and cost reduction, were identified and could be beneficial for other districts. The strategies developed could be adopted by districts to assess provider effectiveness and provide crucial information to parents, aiding informed decisions. This valuable data could guide California districts granted NCLB waivers in program development and accountability system design. Similar analyses are underway in the Los Angeles Unified School District, highlighting the broader potential application of these findings.

The United States witnesses frequent school changes among children due to various reasons, contributing to stress and educational disruption, especially among marginalized groups. Scholars suggest schools should foster better relationships with families to minimize unnecessary mobility, yet these strategies often lack rigorous testing. Researchers evaluated the Families and Schools Together (FAST) intervention's impact on reducing mobility by enhancing parent-school relations in low-income Hispanic elementary schools. Overall, the intervention didn't significantly lower mobility rates, with 35-45% of students changing schools. However, for Black families in the intervention, mobility dropped notably, aligning with other groups. The study underscores that school mobility hinges on diverse reasons; while socioeconomic factors might limit interventions' effectiveness, dissatisfaction or social isolation could be mitigated by fostering stronger school-family ties.

States moved from assessing students' proficiency to using growth models to track academic progress. Researchers analyzed three growth models in a California district, finding more prediction errors for English learners (ELs) than non-ELs. The models often misjudged ELs as remaining non-proficient by 7th grade when they were proficient. This error was more frequent for ELs (16–28%) than non-ELs (13–17%). ELs' steeper learning trajectories might explain this discrepancy; their growth is faster despite early low scores due to language support needs. These model inaccuracies have policy implications, potentially causing unnecessary interventions and not crediting effective instruction in early grades. They could influence the selection of accountability models, especially for student subgroups. Although California hasn't implemented growth-based accountability, it's part of the Smarter Balanced Assessment plans. Notably, the LA Times used a growth model to evaluate teachers, a contentious practice in education due to concerns about validity. The study's evidence questions any model's validity assuming uniform student growth without considering a teacher's student demographics.

The Coleman Report highlighted the strong link between school socioeconomic composition (SEC) and student achievement, supported by subsequent research. However, little focus has been given to school segregation's impact on student attainment, critical for future life outcomes. A new study in the American Educational Research Journal aimed to bridge this gap by examining 10th graders from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. The findings revealed that high SEC schools significantly correlated with higher high school graduation and college enrollment rates, with a 68% greater likelihood for 4-year college enrollment. Peer influence and school emphasis on academics emerged as key mechanisms, showcasing positive influences in high SEC schools but negative impacts in low SEC ones. However, low SEC schools often struggle with student disorder linked to their demographics. Addressing the effects of SEC on attainment requires altering school demographics, necessitating integration by resolving structural barriers. While large-scale busing isn't viable, incentivizing neighborhood integration could facilitate successful school integration, allowing states and municipalities to embrace integration plans willingly.

In recent years, California's Proposition 30 offered some relief to the Community College system, raising the course sections and reducing waitlisted students. Yet, a crucial problem persists: "seat rationing," limiting access. The Student Success Task Force addressed this through priority policies but faces challenges as these policies inherently prioritize certain students while limiting access for others. The upcoming statewide policy will allow flexibility at the college level, posing concerns about equity. Research on registration policies within California's colleges revealed significant variability in these policies, indicating a need for comprehensive studies on their short- and long-term effects. These policies might disadvantage specific student groups, highlighting the necessity for transparent communication and inter-institutional agreements. Moreover, there is a call to improve systems that help students find alternative courses when their preferences are full, possibly through technology-driven solutions. Finally, there's an urgent need for introspection on the underlying values in these policies as they shift from access to fiscal responsibility and credential completion. Understanding these assumptions is vital for informed decisions about the future of community colleges.

High school counselors, often overlooked, are vital in guiding students toward college. The Pathways to College Act acknowledges their role, yet many schools lack systematic ways to provide crucial college and financial aid information. A national study explored how counseling norms and resources impact college-going rates. Findings revealed that a school's environment significantly shapes its college culture. Counseling departments are crucial, with their workload and focus on college counseling directly influencing a school's atmosphere. Resources like financial aid assistance, college fairs, and college-level courses also impact college attendance rates. Schools were categorized based on counseling structures: divergent, emergent, and convergent. Effective counselor education is vital for meaningful college counseling, and counselor caseloads should align with counseling goals. Beyond counselors, school climate and student attitudes shape the college culture, demanding engagement from administrators to foster a supportive environment. Policy implications stress comprehensive counselor education, aligned caseloads, and broader school involvement in promoting a college-going culture. Understanding a school's counseling structure aids administrators in resource allocation, fostering values that enhance college access for all students.

Research largely opposes grade retention due to its negative effects on students academically and developmentally. While this impact on retained students is well-documented, little attention has focused on how retention affects non-retained classmates. a new study delves into the influence of retained classmates on the absence behavior of non-retained students in urban schools. It utilizes a large dataset from an entire school district, finding that a higher percentage of retained classmates correlates with increased absences among non-retained students, particularly unexcused absences, suggesting potential academic disengagement. These results emphasize the need for California to proactively document retention effects and craft supportive policies, crucial for success, especially in high-needs urban schools where retention practices persist despite their potential negative impact.

The Student Success Act of 2012 in California prompts a restructure of student support services in higher education. A new study evaluating a guidance program at South Texas College offers insights for California policymakers and nationwide. This program aimed to aid students struggling in entry-level math courses, a common hurdle in community colleges. It involved Beacon Volunteers giving brief presentations in math classes about available campus services. The evaluation, using random assignment, showed a 30% increase in tutoring center visits and a 20% drop in math class withdrawals. While overall pass rates didn't significantly rise, part-time students benefited with a 10% increase in pass rates. The study highlights the effectiveness of brief, in-classroom interventions and suggests lessons for researchers and practitioners, emphasizing the feasibility of whole-class randomization, the need for more tutoring center research, and the scalability and affordability of such interventions. It underscores the impact of providing information directly to students before they require assistance, offering valuable insights for educational practices.

In California, income-based reading gaps persist. Summer reading programs, including home-based ones, combat the "summer slide." A meta-analysis of 35 studies shows they enhance reading, especially comprehension. School-based programs with research-based strategies notably impact comprehension scores. Low-income students benefit more, perhaps due to differing summer learning loss patterns. Control group students from higher-income backgrounds gain reading scores over summer, contrasting with stable or declining scores for low-income peers, magnifying program effects. However, benefits diminish over time for all. The analysis supports summer programs for literacy. While both school-based and home-based approaches seem equally effective overall, school-based methods stand out with research-based strategies. Despite initial advantages, low-income students also experience fading effects. Addressing this fade-out and ensuring year-round support become crucial for sustaining summer gains.

Researchers spotlight the importance of evaluating the progress of English Learners (ELs), those Reclassified as Fluent English Proficient (RFEPs), and their combined group. An inherent issue emerges: successful RFEPs are often excluded from EL progress assessments due to their reclassification. Analyzing 2010 California data reveals critical insights: RFEPs constitute a significant portion of initially classified ELs (IELs), demonstrating the underestimation of the IEL population when focusing solely on current ELs. Additionally, RFEPs' achievements closely align with English-only students (EOs), suggesting an exaggerated achievement gap between EOs and IELs when RFEPs are omitted. Furthermore, neglecting RFEPs hinders recognizing positive trends; their increasing numbers and enhanced English Language Arts proficiency between 2005 and 2010 remain unnoticed. Policy suggestions emphasize the consistent inclusion of RFEPs in progress assessments to ensure accurate evaluations, especially within federal mandates like the Common Core Initiative.

The "what gets tested, gets taught" adage needs updating to "what gets tested and included in school accountability, gets taught." During No Child Left Behind, science took a backseat to reading and math due to its optional status in accountability measures. Examining states' pre- and post-NCLB performance on NAEP for grades four and eight showed that integrating science into accountability positively impacted fourth-grade scores without affecting math or reading. Eighth-grade results showed no similar link, likely due to dedicated science teachers. Fourth-grade classrooms often burden a single teacher with multiple subjects, leading to a focus on tested areas like reading and math. Research involving fourth-grade teachers in states incorporating science scores confirmed increased science teaching time. California's testing of science from fifth grade misses the earlier integration potential highlighted in this research. While the Elementary and Secondary Education Act reinstated science testing, it still leaves the accountability weight to states. Considering the global need for STEM education, consistently aligning science with reading and math in assessments appears practical. Acknowledging the persistent focus on school accountability, integrating science into assessments is a sensible step to address the current fragmented attention on science education.

In California, student mobility disrupts education for both students and educators, especially in urban schools serving disadvantaged communities. A recent study delves into the Success for All (SFA) program's effectiveness, focusing on early literacy skills for grades K–5. Research utilized a large-scale trial's unique setup to assess SFA's impact on later elementary grades (3–5) by comparing schools implementing SFA in different grade clusters. Surprisingly, the study found no positive or negative effects of SFA in grades 3–5 compared to standard instruction. This contradicts the program's previously observed positive effects in earlier grades from the same trial. These findings suggest that strategies successful in early grades might not seamlessly translate to later ones. However, it is important to note that this study's setup does not mirror the intended SFA implementation. Still, it echoes the experiences of many mobile students who begin in later grades at new schools. The paper concludes that more research is necessary to understand how schools can better support mobile students, emphasizing the need for improved instructional designs in later elementary years, despite earlier successes.