Summary
Summary
This report examines how California’s policies and local practices shape the reclassification of students designated as English learners. Drawing on a nine-year research–practice partnership, it analyzes how locally determined criteria—particularly the “basic skills” requirement—and administrative processes can delay or prevent reclassification. The findings highlight how variation across districts contributes to unequal opportunities, especially in nonunified systems.
Summary
Summary
This report analyzes how California’s school finance system—built to promote equity through the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)—continues to produce unequal opportunities due to property wealth disparities. It explores how “basic aid” districts, which generate more local tax revenue than the state funding formula provides, have accumulated growing advantages over other districts. Drawing on fiscal and demographic analysis, the report highlights how these patterns shape resource gaps and teacher labor markets across the state and offers policy options to promote greater funding equity.
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
The 2021-22 academic year in California was challenging for public education due to eight issues that threaten student learning, schools, and public education itself, including gun violence, declining enrollment, and long-term funding inadequacy. These issues also have a disproportionate impact on marginalized communities and highlight long-standing systemic inequities. In July 2022, PACE and USC Rossier School of Education conducted a poll of California voters to determine their views and priorities on public education.
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
This report examines California's Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) after eight years and suggests refinements to improve equitable funding, opportunities, and outcomes. Based on interviews, research, and data analysis, the report identifies four areas for improvement: revisiting and refining the funding formula, modernizing funding for students with disabilities, equitably distributing effective teachers, and strengthening transparency, engagement, and accountability. LCFF has been viewed as an improvement over the previous system yet gaps between equity goals and local outcomes remain.